Organisational policies and practices
Welcoming and inclusive organisations benefit everyone, irrespective of gender or sexuality.
Welcoming and inclusive organisations play a key role in engaging and maintaining participation of LGBTIQ+ individuals and communities in sport and can benefit everyone irrespective of their gender or sexuality. 2, 14, 15, 18, 25, 77, 78, 121
However, research suggests there is often both passive and active resistance from existing members, and especially those in governance roles, to change. 4, 14, 34, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83
Even when policies exist, they are often not actively promoted or enforced. 53, 65 At least two Australian studies – one in South Australia and one looking at cricket – have found that participants at all levels of sport were only vaguely aware of their organisation’s inclusion policies, or how discriminatory behaviours should be reported or handled. 14, 53
In a 2016 consensus statement the International Olympic Committee (IOC) identified LGBT athletes as a group at high risk of harassment and abuse in sport. It also recommended a systematic approach to prevention, involving athletes, sport managers, medical and therapeutic practitioners, educators, and criminal justice agencies. 61
Inclusion, I think the best way to put it is that I don't have to advocate like, policies are already put in place, I don't have to push for them, I don't have to think about these things. They... someone's already done it, it's already been organized. I just get to exist and be me in a space. A young person quoted in ‘Free to Exist’, Swinburne University for VicHealth, (2024)
Suggestions for practice
Various reports and guidelines provide recommendations and suggestions for ways that sports organisations can improve the involvement and experience of LGBTIQ+ participants, which includes athletes, volunteers, officials, staff, fans, spectators, and others like parents.
- Having clearly established and enforced policies and guidelines for inclusion and against discrimination (codes of conduct, anti-bullying, ban on homo/bi/transphobic language, equal opportunities for all). 10, 17, 72, 76, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88
- Consulting with LGBTIQ+ participants and communities on the policies, procedures, or issues that affect them (e.g. language, inclusion, uniforms). 10, 85, 90
- Providing ongoing education and training for managers, staff, coaches, and officials (paid and volunteer) on inclusion and being an ally. 2, 10, 15, 18, 19, 67, 76, 85, 88, 89
- Engaging in programs that can help educate and sensitise other participants, such as parents, peers, and spectators on the rights of the LGBTQ+ community, using appropriate language, and creating environments where everyone feels safe and supported to participate (e.g. Pride Cups). 2, 4, 84, 89
- Ensuring appropriate facilities and uniform options are available for athletes, volunteers, and staff (including gender-neutral options), and that participants are allowed to choose which are most comfortable for them. 10, 17, 72, 84, 85, 86
- Authentic, clear, and visible signs of active allyship, (for example pride flags or rounds supported by clear inclusion policies and procedures – not just putting a flag up somewhere). 2, 3, 76, 85, 86
- Recruit, support, and promote people with diverse identities at all levels, as athletes, fans, in paid and volunteer roles. 15, 17, 18, 85, 90
- Respecting names and pronouns and consider adopting non-gendered terms on documentation, e.g. allowing individuals to identify various genders, using neutral parent or guardian (not mother/father) for junior sports. 17, 27, 72, 85, 89, 91
Authenticity
Authenticity – backing words and symbolism with sustained and credible actions and commitment – is an important element of engaging LGBTIQ+ communities. People are less likely to support an organisation, or their events and activities, when they perceive them as being inauthentic, and may disengage entirely. 2, 3, 4
The ways in which organisations engage in inclusion activities, e.g. Pride rounds or ‘rainbow’ merchandise, can sometimes be perceived as inauthentic, tokenistic, or marketing (rainbow washing), rather than true inclusion. This occurs most frequently when these activities are not supported by other long-term strategies and actions such as enacting and enforcing policies, for example, actively targeting homo/bi/transphobic language and behaviours of players, spectators, fans, and others in the sporting community. 2, 4, 34, 65, 79, 80, 92, 93, 94
A 2021 review of LGBTQ+ discrimination and exclusion in sport highlighted that although many professional sports – such as the National Hockey League (NHL) or the Australian Football League (AFL) – have widely publicised pride games this often doesn’t lead to significant change. Despite hosting pride games for over ten years homophobic language in ice hockey remains common and generally unsanctioned by officials. This suggests a disconnect between rhetoric and action and raises the question about how authentic the inclusion actions are. 34
Inclusion in sport is often driven by ad-hoc activities and individual champions (short-term programs or once off activities potentially supported by a one-off grant). Long-term change requires systematic leadership and guidance, rather than a piecemeal approach with individual clubs and organisations developing their own strategies, often with limited knowledge and resources. 2, 14, 37, 53, 65, 67, 72, 82, 94, 95, 96, 97
Resources and reading
- Let’s talk inclusion: Key considerations for the inclusion of 2SLGBTQI+ athletes, opens in a new tab, SIRC, (26 June 2024). SIRC has partnered with Canadian Women & Sport to build a new resource for sport leaders and organizations: Key Considerations to Promote the Inclusion of Women, Girls, and 2SLGBTQI+ Athletes. Here, we dive deeper into what’s needed to foster more inclusive sport spaces for 2SLGBTQI+ athletes. We have summarized 5 key areas of focus that were highlighted in the academic literature to help increase 2SLGBTQI+ inclusion in sport. These areas are (1) Policies, (2) Language, (3) Visibility, (4) Culture, and (5) Facilities. We will go through each area in more detail below.
- Sports are supposed to be for all – but new research reveals just how few LGBTQI+ people play sport, opens in a new tab, Ryan Storr, Carleigh Yeomans, Kath Albury, The Conversation, (16 May 2024). Our new research is one of the first pieces of academic research in Australia to document how many LGBTQI+ people play and engage with sport. We also explored current levels of discrimination across sport in Australia, and the barriers and enablers of participation for young LGBTQI+ people. Our research focused specifically on LGBTQI+ people aged 16-25 across community sport and movement settings (including gyms and leisure spaces), and was funded by VicHealth. Our data show targeted efforts and programs are urgently needed to ensure sport and movement settings do not continue to cause harm and force LGBTQI+ youth to drop out from sport. Additionally, the data raise significant challenges for the broader sport sector and its ongoing sustainability. Every sport wants new players and fans, but the sport sector risks losing a whole generation of young people unless it fully commits to reducing and eradicating discrimination towards LGBTQI+ people.
- LGBTIQ+ communities: Strategies, Australian Sports Commission, (accessed 30 July 2025). Provides examples of strategies, policies, and processes that sport organisations can implement to help make sport more inclusive.
- Three principles should guide consultations with athletes about how to include transgender athletes, opens in a new tab, Andy Harvey and Alex Shaw, Play the Game, (19 June 2024). In this opinion piece we report on peer reviewed research that we have co-authored which surveyed 175 elite cis women athletes, and review the known consultation methods of some of the international federations that have recently introduced new transgender policies, and provide some suggestions for how consultations can be fair and present new research about the views of elite athletes on inclusion.
- Practical suggestions on how sports federations can be fair to transgender athletes, opens in a new tab, Andy Harvey, Play the Game, (26 March 2024). Recently, I have participated in two conferences and one expert meeting on the topic and am convinced that sport's rule makers need some assistance in working out how best to include trans athletes in their sports. This article sets out a brief guide to some of the relevant matters they should take into account when developing policy.
- The AFL's never had an openly gay player. Insiders say a culture of homophobia lingers, opens in a new tab, Louise Milligan, ABC Four Corners, (21 August 2023). Michael O'Donnell's silence set in when he was 13. Puberty hit him with all its force and with it, the realisation he wasn't like the other kids in his suburban Aussie rules football club in Melbourne's eastern suburbs. "I started realising who I was as a person," O'Donnell tells Four Corners. He didn't see himself in the broader game either. There were no players, no coaches — no-one was openly gay. It wasn't just on the field that O'Donnell felt he wasn't accepted. He grew up watching the football panel shows and hearing the words from the commentary boxes. He heard everything from smutty jokes and innuendo to blatant homophobia. O'Donnell has cast off the shame. He's telling his story because he wants every single kid starting out in the sport to feel safe.
- Call for councils to join battle to make sport safe for LGBTIQA+ community, opens in a new tab, Matilda Marozzi, ABC Radio Melbourne, (18 February 2023). The 2016 consensus statement from the International Olympic Committee also found the presence of psychological abuse can be a "gateway" to physical and sexual abuse. While it is clear abusive language is used at sporting clubs and that it is incredibly harmful, what has been harder to establish is how to stop it. Dr Denison believes the education wasn't effective because it wasn't being backed up by club leaders on a day-to-day basis. "The coaches, who are volunteers, were not enforcing policies that ban this very harmful language," Dr Denison says. To stop homophobic language and make clubs safe, Dr Denison says change needs to come from the top — from the (mostly) men who are running the clubs, and volunteering as coaches. He wants councils, which often run sporting facilities and fund local clubs, to step in and help clubs comply with child safety standards. Dr Denison says they can do this by introducing "safe sports officers" to attend training and matches and help drive positive change — as recommended by the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.
- Article also includes an example of how a female cricketer put together a pride cup for all six women's teams in her league, including having specially made pride jerseys for the cup that the team has continued to wear throughout the season. Despite the activity being described as a success and that club members were 'happy for it to go on' no-one else offered to help run the event the next year (so it didn't happen) and there were no moves for the men's team to also be involved in a pride cup or even a pride game. Additionally, while a rainbow flag is flown when the women play on Sundays, it is not flown when the men play on Saturdays. Dr Denison says Ms Walsh's experience highlights the challenge of getting those who do not personally experience discrimination involved in pride initiatives. Where there is progress, Dr Denison says it is usually left up to a few "champions of change". "For it to be effective it needs to be coming from all the leaders of the club," he says.
- Positive sport experiences of gay men, opens in a new tab, Jake Quinton and Kyle Rich, SIRC, (7 December 2022). In this blog, we discuss our research, in which we interviewed 9 gay men between the ages of 30 and 45 to examine their experiences in organized sports, how they navigate stressors, and ultimately how they derive well-being from sport participation. Finding community is at the core of why many participants in our study participate in sports.
- Creating inclusive sport environments requires recognizing the diversity of experiences that participants bring to sport contexts and the complex ways that people derive well-being through sport. Sport organizers must consider factors within their organizations and their communities more broadly when developing inclusion initiatives. Establishing policies that do not tolerate homophobia and actively shape safe and welcoming spaces for participation are important.
- Our research suggests that positive sport experiences are derived not only from participating, but from building relationships with a range of people, having and being role models, and being competitive and successful in sport itself. Therefore, organizers should also consider how they can foster broader organizational cultures that support and value contributions of diverse participants as players, coaches, leaders, and peers.
- Strict sport policies force non-binary footballer to choose between footy dreams and gender identity, opens in a new tab, Asha Couch, ABC Great Southern, (24 September 2022). If you were forced to choose between your passion, and yourself…how would you decide? At 19, Zee Schorsch should be just starting on their journey as a football athlete. Zee works in the footy industry and plays at a state level. Zee is also non-binary; they don't identify as either a man or a woman, so finding their place in a sport that is strictly divided by gender has not been an easy feat.
- Making sport more inclusive for the LGBTQ+ community, opens in a new tab, Isha Saxena, sportanddev.org, (30 June 2022). LGBTQ+ inclusion in sport has been contentious, but LGBTQ+ rights are human rights, and for sport to be an inclusive space, it is imperative that LGBTQ+ policies and procedures are institutionalized in grassroots and elite sport. Sport federations and other sport-based organizations must have strict policies on respecting the LGBTQ+ community. This can include clauses on anti-bullying, a ban on transphobic and homophobic language, and the provision of equal opportunities for all, including members of the LGBTQ+ community, at all levels of sport.
- How coaches and sport organizations can create a better experience for LGBTQ+ youth, opens in a new tab, Dawn E. Trussell, Kyle Rich, Jake Quinton, SIRC, (29 June 2022). Participating in sport can have many benefits for LGBTQ+ youth. Sport has the potential to bring joy, distraction and mindfulness that frees LGBTQ+ youth from worry and fear in other domains of their lives. Sport can also provide important social connections and support for LGBTQ+ youth as they negotiate coming out. In this blog, we explain why LGBTQ+ youth often feel unsafe in sport. Aligned with a movement to understand the nuances of different gender and sexual identities we focus on LGBTQ+ identities. We also recommend 5 strategies that coaches and other sport leaders should consider to create more inclusive cultures in their teams and organizations for LGBTQ+ and transgender, and queer or questioning (LGBTQ+) identities.
- 5 ways to build LGBTQIA+ inclusion in clubs, opens in a new tab, Meg Young, Club Respect, (2022?). Research shows us that homophobia, biphobia and transphobia are alarming commonplace in our sporting codes. Allowing this culture of disrespect to continue means young sports players stay in the closet or drop out of the sport completely. For local sporting clubs, this means risking diminished performance, missing out on top talent and passing up on the financial and reputational benefits of building a respectful culture. Includes 5 tips for creating a culture that respects everyone, including LGBTQIA+ people, including Top-down and a zero-tolerance approach; Make your pride visible; Create an inclusion sub-committee; Host a pride round feat. education session; Create a formal commitment, policy or code of conduct to respect and inclusion.
- Why is AFL the only pro sport to never have an openly gay male player?, opens in a new tab Erik Denison, Sydney Morning Herald, (25 June 2021). Few people realise the men’s AFL is the only major professional male sport in the world to never have had an openly gay or bisexual player, even after retirement.
- Thirty studies provide strong evidence of need for action, opens in a new tab, Out on the Fields, (21 May 2021). Over the last two decades dozens of academic studies have found strong resistance and little progress in stopping the discrimination that LGBTQ+ children and adults experience in sport. There are many people in the sport sector who want to do the right thing, but may be unaware of everything done in the past. This means the same ineffective approaches have been repeated. For example, we have had peer-reviewed scientific evidence for at least a decade that the policies in sport that ban homophobic behaviours are ineffective and need to be completely redesigned. They are complaint-based, which means a child would have to file a formal complaint about their teammates using homophobic banter. The policies also often only prohibit language motivated by hate, whereas this language is used constantly in sport and generally used to conform to social norms. We created this list of resources to help break this cycle.
- Proud to be open for all, opens in a new tab, Leigh Rogers, Tennis Australia, (17 May 2021). As Tennis Australia proudly celebrates International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia, Interphobia and Transphobia (IDAHOBIT), trans player Seth Garth explains why initiatives to promote inclusion are so important to grow the sport.
- How Tasmania's first LGBTIQA+ basketball team wants to change community sport, opens in a new tab, Megan Macdonald, ABC, (9 February 2021). Bushrangers Basketball is Australia's largest LGBTIQA+ basketball club. The club is aimed at providing "safe spaces for trans and gender diverse players". Rather than a priority on winning, the club strives for "non-competitive, fun games".
- Does the Rainbow Laces campaign help to end homophobia in sport?, opens in a new tab Erik Denison, Monash Lens, (4 December 2020). Unfortunately, there's no evidence that the Rainbow Laces campaign, as it's done now, helps to stop homophobic language or make sport more inclusive and welcoming for LGBTQ people. However, with a refocus of the campaign away from professional clubs, and towards amateur clubs and teams, Rainbow Laces could help to reduce homophobic language in sport.
- Homophobia drastically reduced at Australian clubs taking part in pride games, opens in a new tab, Mike Hytner, The Guardian, (26 August 2020). Research, led by Australia’s Monash University, is the first academic study to investigate if such themed games or rounds, which aim to address a range of social issues including homophobia, racism and respect for women, can help stop discriminatory behaviours in male sport. The study focused on the Australian Ice Hockey League and found players in teams that hold pride games use nearly 40% less homophobic language than those in teams that have not held games. A subsequent, larger study that included community cricket, netball, Australian rules football, field hockey, and roller derby reported nearly identical results.
- The Invisible Men of the AFL, opens in a new tab, John Buck, (launched August 2024). Podcast series investigating the AFL as a workplace for gay men. Episode 1 includes an interview with Dr David Lowden from La Trobe University whose research is due to be published later in 2024. Dr Lowden did an anonymous survey of 670 players from 17 AFL clubs in which several ticked boxes confirming that they were gay or bisexual. Other episodes look at homophobia in the AFL, legal tipping points, and more.
- Developing Sport for Women and Girls, opens in a new tab, Emma Sherry, Katie Rowe, Routledge, (2020). Provides critical analysis of contemporary sport development, from high performance pathways to engaging diverse communities to the use of sport to empower women and girls. Each chapter explores various contexts of sport development and sport for development theory with a specific focus on women and girls. Specific chapters include: Promoting LGBT+ Inclusion in Women’s and Girls’ Sport: Lessons from Australia; Regulating High Testosterone in International Women’s Sport; and more.
- Diversity and Inclusion in Sport Organizations: a multilevel perspective, opens in a new tab (fourth edition), Cunningham G, Routledge, (2019). A comprehensive introduction to the ways in which people differ—including race, gender, age, mental and physical ability, appearance, religion, sexual orientation, and social class—and the importance of these differences for sport organizations. It offers strategies for managing diversity in work and sport environments and provides an overview of diversity training that can be implemented in the workplace.
- No Slam Dunk. Gender, Sport and the Unevenness of Social Change, opens in a new tab, Cooky, C and Messner, M.A., Rutgers University Press, (2018). This book discusses the recent and significant gender transformations in sport as well as the persistent inequality and discrimination experienced by women, girls, LGBTI people. Covers intersectionality – acknowledging the complexity of gender relations, sex (and DSD in women’s elite sport competition), sexuality, class, ethnic, and racial inequality. A sociological and historical contribution to understanding the nature and politics of gender, sex and sexuality in contemporary sport from a North American and international perspective.
- Out in Sport: The experiences of openly gay and lesbian athletes in competitive sport, opens in a new tab, Eric Anderson, Rory Magrath, Rachael Bullingham, Routledge, (2016). Research has shown that since the turn of the millennia, matters have rapidly improved for gays and lesbians in sport. Where gay and lesbian athletes were merely tolerated a decade ago, today they are celebrated. This book represents a comprehensive examination of the experiences of gays and lesbians in sport. Drawing on interviews with openly gay and lesbian athletes in the US and the UK, as well as media accounts, the book examines the experiences of ‘out’ men and women, at recreational, high school, university and professional levels, in addition to those competing in gay sports leagues.
- Routledge Handbook on Sport, Gender and Sexuality, opens in a new tab, Hargreaves J and Anderson E (editors), Routledge, (2014). Chapters are authored by experts and organised into eight parts: (1) historical perspectives; (2) views from countries across the world; (3) diversity and division; (4) gender conformity and its challenges; (5) homosexuality – issues and challenges; (6) questioning and transgressing sex; (7) power, control and abuse; and (8) gender and sexuality in the mediation of sport.
- The Gay Games: A history, opens in a new tab, Symons C., Routledge, (2010). Since their inception in 1980, the Gay Games have developed into a multi-million dollar mega-event, engaging people from all continents, while the international Gay Games movement has become one of the largest and most significant international institutions for gay and lesbian people. Drawing on detailed archival research, oral history and participant observation techniques, and informed by critical feminist theory and queer theory, this book offers the first comprehensive history of the Gay Games from 1980 through to the Chicago games of 2006. It explores the significance of the Games in the context of broader currents of gay and lesbian history and addresses a wide range of key contemporary themes within sports studies, including the cultural politics of sport, the politics of difference and identity, and the rise of sporting mega-events.
- Creating inclusive spaces in tennis, opens in a new tab, Dave Hardman, Sport England, (20 June 2024). In 2021, the LTA launched its first Inclusion Strategy, placing inclusion at the core of its vision of ‘Tennis Opened Up’ and building a culture of everyday inclusion. Our journey began by listening to and learning from our underrepresented communities.
- Diversity is an advantage at Loton Park Tennis Club, opens in a new tab, Tennis Australia, YouTube, (21 December 2018). Award-winning Loton Park Tennis Club, based in Perth, Western Australia openly welcomes all participants who identify as LGBTQ+. Their motto is “Diversity is our advantage”. Members of the club have the opportunity to participate in league competitions, social play, Come and Try Days and many other events. Loton Park Tennis Club has strong relationships with other local sports organisations, sharing resources and events.
- Inclusion in Sport Coaching Resource: LGBTQI2S, opens in a new tab, viasport British Columbia, (2023). As a coach, you are largely responsible for creating and maintaining a culture in which all participants will thrive. In creating a safe and welcoming space for your LGBTQI2S participants, you will be making a significant impact on their lives, as well as benefiting the other participants you coach.
- A Coach's Guide: LGBTQI2S Sport Inclusion, opens in a new tab, CoachNB, (2022). Coach NB’s objective with this resource is to provide guiding principles to help coaches create more inclusive environments, practices and policies in their sport organizations for LGBTQI2S athletes, administrators, coaches, officials and volunteers. This guide is designed to support organizations interested in becoming more inclusive to all sexual orientations, gender identities and gender expressions.
- 2SLGBTQI Sports Inclusion: Playbook to breaking down barriers, opens in a new tab, Egale, (2021?) . Being able to practice 2SLGBTQI allyship in sport starts by understanding the barriers to 2SLGBTQI inclusion and accessibility. This resource lays out the different barriers of discrimination that exist in sports and provides tips and tricks on how to foster a more inclusive sport environment. Whether you are a coach, athlete, administrative staff, parent, or a fan, this resource will start you off in thinking about strategies for the inclusion work we all have a part to play in.
- Guidelines for the inclusion of transgender and gender diverse people in sport, opens in a new tab, Australian Human Rights Commission in partnership with the Australian Sports Commission and the Coalition of Major Professional and Participation Sports, (June 2019). These Guidelines have been developed to provide guidance to sporting organisations on promoting the inclusion and participation of transgender and gender diverse people in sport. The Guidelines provide information about the operation of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) (the Act) in relation to unlawful and permissible discrimination on the basis of sex and gender identity, sexual harassment, and victimisation as well as practical guidance for promoting inclusion in line with fundamental human rights-based principles. Areas of focus include leadership, inclusion policies, codes of conduct, uniforms, facilities, and collecting and using personal information.
- Reflective Practice Framework, opens in a new tab, Australian Human Rights Commission, (June 2019). The Commission has also developed this Reflective Practice Framework to assist in monitoring the implementation and impact of the 2019 'Guidelines for the inclusion of transgender and gender diverse people in sport'.
- Pride Cup, opens in a new tab works with all levels of sport to build a world where every LGBTI+ person feels included, accepted and proud to be who they are. When Jason Ball publicly came out as gay in 2012, his teammates from the Yarra Glen Football Netball Club wanted to show him they had his back. The team came up with the idea to stage a Pride Cup, with players wearing rainbow jumpers, and 50 metre lines painted in rainbow colours. It was an event that galvanised the entire community and became the inspiration for the now annual AFL Pride Game, first played between St Kilda FC and Sydney Swans in 2016. Since hitting the national stage, communities across Australia have joined the movement, with Pride Cups being expanded into other sporting codes nationally.
- ACON Pride in Diversity, opens in a new tab is a not-for-profit organisation that supports all aspects of LGBTI inclusion. Pride in Diversity’s mandate is to reduce stigma, homophobia, and discrimination in the workplace and set a national benchmark for leading workplace practice in LGBTI inclusion. This is currently being realised via the national employer support program (Pride in Diversity) and the Australian Workplace Equality Index (AWEI), Australia’s national benchmarking instrument for LGBTI workplace inclusion. An extension of the benchmarking program into the Australian sport sector is the' Pride in Sport Index (PSI)' that was launched in 2016.
- Proud 2 Play, opens in a new tab focuses on increasing LGBTIQ+ engagement in sport, exercise and active recreation. To do this, we work with all levels of the sporting community, from individual participants and grassroots communities, to state and national sporting organisations. We seek to encourage LGBTIQ+ people (as well as their allies, friends and families) to participate and engage in sport and exercise by providing structured opportunities and pathways for them to do so. Engagement is not limited to just actively participating in sport; the physical, mental and social benefits of sport should be experienced by active participants, volunteers, coaches and officials. Proud2Play focusses on Education, Policy, Events, Research and Partnerships.
- Rainbow Ready Roadmap, opens in a new tab, Victoria Government, (accessed 30 July 2025). A set of resources to help Victorian communities build lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and gender diverse, intersex and queer (LGBTIQA+) inclusion.
- Trans and Gender Diverse Inclusion. The Australian Sports Commission (ASC) website provides a number of resources, FAQs and Case studies to help support sporting clubs and organisations to create more inclusive and welcoming sporting environments for everyone.
- Thrive with Pride Program. This Australian Sports Commission program aims to support rainbow athletes and allies with driving LGBTIQ+ inclusion initiatives within Australian sporting communities so we can help celebrate and empower LGBTIQ+ peoples.
- VicTennis, opens in a new tab is proud to be one of the largest and longest standing LGBTIQ+ sporting associations in Victoria. They coordinate opportunities for both social hits along with team competitions and tournaments that are contested as part of the global GLTA tour with opportunities for all skill levels. All Victennis events are inclusive and we welcome all players who belong to or support the LGBTIQ+ community.
- LEAP Sports Scotland, opens in a new tab (Leadership, Equality and Active Participation in Sports for LGBTI people in Scotland) works for greater inclusion for LGBTI people in sport and against homophobia, biphobia and transphobia in a sports context. We are committed to breaking down the structural, social and personal barriers which prevent lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) people across the country from accessing, participating and excelling in Scottish sports. Website provides a wide variety of information, programs and resources including:
- Using Major Sports Events to Further LGBTIQ+ Equality, opens in a new tab, (2019). Toolkit produced as part of the Narrowing the Margins project
- Swimming in Glasgow for the transgender community: community consultation, opens in a new tab, (2015). A report on the swimming experiences of transgender people in the Glasgow area.
- LGBTIQ+ 101, opens in a new tab, (2020). A resource for sports coaches, P.E Teachers, and peers to learn how to best support and include LGBTIQ+ people in their teams.
- Pride in Water, opens in a new tab, British Swimming. A network to support LGBT+ athletes, coaches, officials, support staff and all involved in aquatic sports who are passionate about inclusion within the disciplines. The primary aim of Pride in Water is to create a safe space for LGBT+ members and allies alike to connect with other similar people across the sports and further support members to be themselves.
- 2024 Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Survey: Play, Active Recreation and Sport Workforce, opens in a new tab, Angus and Associates for Sport New Zealand Ihi Aotearoa, (July 2024). The 2024 Diversity, Equity and Inclusion survey follows an earlier survey in 2020 and is designed to provide a current view of the makeup and experiences of people working (as paid employees or board members) in the play, active recreation and sport sector. For this report people who identify as members of rainbow communities are those who selected ‘Another gender’ for the Gender identity question, and/or selected ‘gay or lesbian’, or ‘bisexual’ or ‘other’ for the Sexual orientation question.
- Relative to New Zealand’s adult population as a whole, the workforce includes higher proportions of women and people who identify as part of rainbow communities. 8% of the sector’s workforce are people who identify as members of rainbow communities; 90% Heterosexual, 3% Gay or lesbian, 3% Bisexual, 1% Other, 2% Prefer not to say.
- Compared with others, people who identify as members of rainbow communities are less likely to agree that ‘I can speak up without being punished or humiliated’, and ‘the organisation puts its commitment to DEI into practice’. They are more likely to have no trust in their organisation to handle integrity issues appropriately and effectively.
- In the last 12 months, discrimination, harassment or bullying in the workplace has been experienced by 18% of people who identify as members of the rainbow community (vs 10% Total Sample) and observed by 33% (vs 20% Total Sample).
- People who identify as members of rainbow communities are more likely to see barriers to career progression than other members of the workforce. The barriers that are felt most differently by this group include ‘poor salary/renumeration’, ‘bias’, and ‘poor leadership’
- Feedback from survey respondents indicates that many organisations in the sector have no formal DE&I policy/strategy, or at least not one that is known to members of their board or staff. As a policy/strategy will guide and shape an organisation’s approach to DE&I, it is likely that further progress will be made if more organisations are encouraged and supported to develop their own DE&I policies/strategies and to share these with their teams.
- Free to exist: Documenting participation data on LGBTIQA+ young people in sport and physical activity, opens in a new tab, Ryan Storr, Carleigh Yeomans, Kath Albury, et al., Swinburne University for VicHealth, (May 2024). The aim of this mixed-method research project was to collect participation data on LGBTIQA+ young people (aged 16-25) in sport and physical activity, whilst exploring the experiences, needs and engagement of LGBTIQA+ young people in sport and movement settings. In total, 20 young people aged 16-25 years participated in 5 focus groups, and 506 LGBTIQA+ young people participated in a quantitative survey. Quantitative and qualitative data paint a concerning picture of young LGBTIQA+ people’s participation in sport and physical activity, with lower rates of participation and engagement than the wider population and high rates of discrimination when they do engage. However, more promising, are the perspectives of young people who want to engage in sport and movement, and their motivation for sport and movement spaces to do more to be inclusive. Our data highlight the need for policy makers, sport managers, and physical activity providers to undertake targeted LGBTIQA+ diversity and inclusion work to ensure that LGBTIQA+ young people can access safe, inclusive, and equitable environments that are free from discrimination. Ongoing education, training, and development related to LGBTIQA+ inclusive practices are important to ensure sport environments are inclusive of LGBTIQA+ people. The consequences of not doing this work are far reaching and may have significant long-term impacts and consequences for LGBTIQA+ people, including trauma, and physical inactivity throughout their life course. Ensuring young LGBTIQA+ people have positive experiences through adolescence and youth is crucial to encourage lifelong participation and to develop positive relationships with physical activity; sports and physical activity providers must make authentic commitments to ensure that sport and movement spaces are safe and inclusive for LGBTIQA+ young people. Young people want to see authentic pride efforts that engage all sections of LGBTIQA+ communities, efforts which attempt to address ongoing discrimination and hostility towards LGBTIQA+ people. Key findings included:
- Young LGBTIQA+ people are engaging with gyms and leisure or fitness facilities at higher rates than with sport, highlighting the future challenges for the sport sector on losing a generation of young people who see gyms and leisure spaces as alternatives to sport participation.
- The biggest factors with potential to encourage participation for this group are friend referrals (57%), welcoming and affirming culture of LGBTIQA+ people (45%), and LGBTIQA+ specific come and try programs (42%).
- Young LGBTIQA+ people have strong views towards pride efforts in sport. They emphasised the challenge of rainbow washing from sport organisations. Further, participants discussed the negative impacts on their mental health, including ongoing debates and discussions of LGBTIQA+ people’s lives through the medium of sport (including trans athletes and pride games).
- PSI Practice Points: Data analysis from the PSI National Survey, Best practice for the inclusion of people of diverse genders and sexualities in Australian Sport, opens in a new tab, Pride in Sport, (2023). The annual Pride in Sport Equality Index (PSI) National Survey has been running for the past five years. Solid growth year on year has seen the survey go from 2 participating organisations/clubs and 14 responses in its first year to 27 and 1,043 responses in 2023. The PSI National Survey provides insight into the culture, beliefs, opinions, and differences between LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ respondents. All organisation who participated in the survey are working on LGBTQ inclusion. These results reflect the attitudes and knowledge of respondents who are in these organisations/clubs. These results likely differ from other surveys due to this positive focus on LGBTQ inclusion of these organisations/clubs.
- 68.7% agree an organisation's/club's positive track record in this aspect of inclusion would positively influence them to join the organisation/club (2022: 59.0%) an increase of 16.3%.
- There was a decrease in the number of respondents who: believe they understand some of the unique challenges that people of diverse sexuality and/or gender face in the workplace/sports clubs (2023: 80.6% v 2022: 86.6%); believe that there are more than 2 genders (2023: 59.1% v 2022: 61.9%); and a slight decrease in belief that a person of diverse gender would be welcome in the team and treated no differently to anyone else (2023: 86.4% v 2022: 87.3%).
- 74.2% of respondents also agree that they believe training in this aspect of diversity and inclusion should be mandatory for anyone who manages or supervises other people. Respondents with direct reports agree to this slightly more than those who do not (75.3% v 73.4%).
- For people of diverse gender or sexuality, their rates of health and wellbeing are coming in lower than those who are not diverse. LGBTQ respondents are: 8.9% less likely to agree to feeling productive, 7.4% less likely to feel a sense of belonging, 5% less likely to feel engaged with the organisation, 4.1% less likely to feel mentally well or that they can be themselves.
- Visible active allies within organisations/clubs have many impacts on organisational culture, particularly for people of diverse sexuality and/gender. 68.2% of respondents agreed that active allies have positively impacted their sense of inclusion.
- Evaluating LGBTI+ Inclusion within Sport and the Pride Cup Initiative, opens in a new tab, Ruth Jeanes, Karen Lambert, Justen O' Connor, et.al., Monash University for VicHealth, (2020). In July 2019, VicHealth commissioned research to measure the impact of the Pride Cup program and resources. The evaluation suggests that clubs involved experience a range of benefits and positive impacts from their participation and the Pride Cup offers an accessible and structured way for them to engage and consider LGBTI+ inclusion. The evaluation contributes to an understanding of what works in LGBTI+ inclusion approaches within sport and why, in relation to changing long outdated attitudes and behaviours. Despite the problem of LGBTI+ discrimination and exclusion from sport being well studied, there is very little research focused on finding effective solutions.
- Motivations for participating in the Pride Cup focused on including and supporting the LGBTI+ community, whilst promoting inclusion more broadly. The majority of organisers felt they completely achieved the objective of including and supporting the LGBTI+ community.
- The vast majority of organisers felt that hosting a Pride Cups created greater awareness of LGBTI+ inclusion and sent a strong message that homophobia would not be tolerated. All but three organisers moderately or very much agreed that significant people in the club had been educated about LGBTI+ inclusion.
- All organisers felt club members were either moderately or extremely supportive of running a Pride Cup. Organisers felt the time taken to organise and the resources required to be the most challenging aspects. Generally, the survey suggested there was limited resistance, but it could be challenging getting members on board.
- All interviewees were in agreement that the Pride Cup had assisted with raising the clubs’ profile within the local community and enhanced their clubs’ reputation as community minded and engaged with social justice issues. Interviewees also discussed how the Pride Cup had provided opportunities to make connections with a range of businesses and community partners. A number of clubs outlined how their involvement in the Pride Cup had helped them gain greater levels of sponsorship from community organisations and due to the higher spectator attendance 8 at Pride Cup games, benefit financially from sales of food, drink etc. Clubs had engaged with LGBTI+ members where possible, or the LGBTI+ community more broadly to varying degrees.
- All interviewees were positive about the Pride Cup education sessions and felt they had been useful in raising awareness of LGBTI+ inclusion amongst members and identifying some of the key ways that LGBTI+ members may be excluded within sporting contexts. An important function of the education sessions was highlighting the damaging impact of homophobic and exclusionary language, with all interviewees indicating that they, and their club members, had greater levels of awareness of the detrimental impact of language. Subsequently, volunteers suggested that they and other club members would be more willing to call out and challenge the use of such language within the club environment because of the training. One of the challenges was encouraging all club members to participate in education. Seven interviewees had not attended the education and whilst clubs generally reported good attendance (around 50 club members on average), the education was not thought to be having a whole club reach at some clubs, an issue reinforced by the organisers and members’ surveys.
- There was a tendency within some clubs to suggest that through the Pride Cup, LGBTI+ inclusion was ‘done’ and they would then move their focus onto the next issue. There was little discussion of how LGBTI+ inclusion would continue to be enacted beyond the Pride Cup event. Most clubs spoken with indicated they had either a small number of LGBTI+ members or none and there were very few openly gay men. Interviewees acknowledged that although they felt that their club was welcoming and inclusive of LGBTI+ participants, this may still not be the perception amongst the LGBTI+ community. There were not many examples of further activities that were seeking to encourage LGBTI+ individuals to join the club. The data would suggest that the cup has not yet prompted further engagement in LGBTI+ inclusion. It’s important to acknowledge however, that for clubs who were engaging for the first time this year (3 of the 5 clubs involved in interviews), it is still early in the culture change process. Engagement in the Pride Cup appears to provide a valuable platform from which clubs could engage in further inclusion work.
- Overall, participants from Pride Cup clubs were significantly less likely to use or witness the use of discriminatory language than participants from comparison clubs. This suggests the Pride Cup may potentially reduce discriminatory and exclusionary behaviours related to language use. Whilst the Pride Cup may have moderated exclusionary language it didn’t remove it, suggesting more work is needed.
- LGBTI+ Inclusion within Victorian Sport: A Market Analysis, opens in a new tab, Ruth Jeanes, Erik Denison, Nadia Bevan, et.al., Monash University for VicHealth, (2020). In 2019, VicHealth commissioned researchers within the Faculty of Education at Monash University to conduct a market analysis examining the work that has been undertaken to date, and current activities in the state of Victoria, Australia, focused on promoting LGBTI+ engagement and participation in sport. This document provides an overview of the programs, interventions, reports and education undertaken in the sport and LGBTI+ inclusion space across the last 20 years. Furthermore, the report details some of the findings of key academic literature and evaluation reports examining the impact of LGBTI+ sporting initiatives delivered in Australia and overseas. In particular, it details contemporary knowledge regarding approaches to LGBTI+ inclusion and perceived impact of interventions. The report is structured to respond to several key questions: 1. What does current research tell us about the experiences of LGBTI+ people in sport? 2. What work has taken place within Victoria to support LGBTI+ inclusion and reduce discrimination? 3. Which organisations are operating in Victoria to promote LGBTI+ inclusion and how have these connected with sport? 4. What work are State Sporting Associations undertaking to support LGBTI+ Inclusion and what support would they like moving forward? 5. What recommendations have emerged from existing LGBTI+ in sport reports and evaluations? The report concludes by pointing towards potential areas for further investment to enhance LGBTI+ inclusion within sport.
- Non-binary inclusion in sport, opens in a new tab, T. Snape & Co., (2020). The premise of this booklet is not that people who identify as non-binary (neither male nor female) are a problem for sport. Instead, we suggest they highlight important issues that sport, and society more generally, should attend to. We discuss these challenges and identify ways of addressing them. We aim to provide sports organisations and organisers; sports regulators and governing bodies; and members of sporting communities at large, with a resource to help accessibility for non-binary people and people of all genders. This booklet includes a summary of a research workshop which took place specifically to explore non-binary inclusion in sport, three case studies showcasing examples of non-binary inclusion, derived from people’s lived experiences of organising and participating in sport, and some tips for being a non-binary ally.
- Non-Binary People, Sport and Physical Activity, opens in a new tab, Pride in Sports for Sport England, (2020). The word non-binary describes a wide array of different identities which fall outside of the gender binary, and can be related to, or completely separate from male and female gender identities. Whilst non-binary is often described as part of the trans umbrella, not all nonbinary people identify as trans. It is estimated that around 0.4% of the UK’s population identify as non-binary, although it is thought that non-binary identities may be on the rise, particularly amongst young people. Research conducted by the National LGBT Partnership in 2016 found that people who identified as something other than male or female were some of the most inactive people amongst LGBT+ populations. Sport England commissioned Pride Sports to devise policy guidance for non-binary inclusion in grassroots sport and physical activity. The following report reflects data and commentary gathered through desk research, as well as input from focus groups and individual discussions with nonbinary people. Key challenges are faced by non-binary people in the following areas: Gendered Spaces; Gendered Activity; Representation and Visibility; and, Language These barriers are addressed within the report through recommendations themed accordingly, whilst examples of existing adaptations made within mainstream grassroots sport to accommodate nonbinary people are also highlighted. Consideration is also given within the report to the specific challenge of school sport and PE and to the performance pathway.
- Pride in Our Workforce: Exploring the role of the workforce in LGBT+ participation in physical activity and sport, opens in a new tab, Bournemouth University for Energise Me and Sport England, (2020). Researchers from Bournemouth University concluded that the physical activity and sport workforce (LGBT+ and non-LGBT+) has untapped potential to play a more prominent role in providing opportunities for LGBT+ communities. They can help by Increasing LGBT+ representation within the workforce (in paid and unpaid roles); Being approachable, inclusive and understanding; Creating environments that feel safe and welcoming for LGBT+ communities; Actively promoting activities for and/or to LGBT+ communities. Some key findings included:
- Heterosexual people were more likely to occupy a workforce role. On average, they held significantly more roles in the workforce than other sexual identity groups
- Non-binary individuals (those whose gender identity does not sit comfortably with ‘man’ or ‘woman’) were less likely to occupy a position in the workforce than participants that identified as men or women.
- Transgender research participants were less likely to hold a workforce role. Transgender participants also occupied significantly fewer roles in the workforce when compared with non-transgender individuals.
- LGBT+ workforce members displayed more varied responses in relation to comfort in expressing sexual or gender identity in their workforce role. Women who identified as lesbian were more likely to report feeling uncomfortable to express their sexual identity.
- For LGBT+ respondents, it is less important that workforce members are qualified or experienced than it is that they are approachable, inclusive and understanding.
- Participants clearly articulate that marketing and promotions are crucial in order to ‘speak to’ LGBT+ communities in a manner that advocates inclusion. Ideas included symbols of inclusion, diverse imagery, and the creation/promotion of LGBT+ specific sessions.
- Participants’ comments repeatedly cited changing facilities as sites of fear, lack of safety, and insecurity for LGBT+ communities. This is especially true for non-binary and transgender participants, for whom traditional male/female changing spaces present challenging environments.
- Participants discussed how disabilities or other characteristics coincided with their gender or sexual identity to create multiple effects, making physical activity and sport environments less inclusive or accessible. Understanding the person is a key agenda for future practice.
- The need for training and knowledge emerged strongly in participant comments about how the workforce could be improved.
- Challenging discrimination is a key way for the physical activity and sport workforce to increase perceptions of safety and inclusion for the LGBT+ community.
- The workforce requires role models, from elite through to grassroots physical activity and sport. Participants wanted to see more openly LGBT+ leaders at elite and grassroots levels - be it high-profile athletes and pundits (e.g. Gareth Thomas or Claire Balding) or LGBT+ individuals in the physical activity and sport workforce.
- Review of LGBT+ Sport and Physical Activity Infrastructure, opens in a new tab, Scott Lawley, Sara Smith, Nottingham Trent University for Pride Sports and Sport England, (December 2018). The report draws upon desk research across the range of LGBT+ sports provision in England, and further in-depth research with 40 sports and physical activity providers, both of which took place in June 2017. Key findings included:
- Commercial and mainstream providers do not keep data and have little insight relating to the numbers of their LGBT+ participants. Furthermore, they demonstrated little insight into the specific barriers to participation that members of their LGBT+ membership might face.
- LGBT+ sports groups face many challenges to their successful operation which relate to governance structures and to resources such as time, finance, facilities and volunteers. Many groups struggle with capacity whilst at the same time facing demands in terms of safeguarding and widening participation which are arguably greater than those faced by mainstream clubs.
- There is a ‘culture of gender-binarism’ in mainstream sports provision, including educational settings. This is evidenced in the gender-segregated layout of sports facilities, in rules and regulations which govern participation based on gender, and in hostile cultures and attitudes, all of which serve to exclude trans and gender non-binary participants.
- Providers of trans-specific sports sessions face similar practical challenges of cost, resources and capacity to wider LGBT+ providers. However, the gender-binarism of mainstream sport, negative attitudes encountered in mainstream sports spaces and a lack of support and wider education creates further challenges which must be faced in all spaces where trans-specific sport takes place in order to make them safe for their participants.
- Issues Paper - National Guidelines: Trans and intersex inclusion in sport, opens in a new tab, Australian Human Rights Commission, (21 June 2018). This issues paper was released by the AHRC to help guide the consultation process with stakeholders in relation to the development of guidelines for trans and gender diverse inclusion in sport. It provides participants with an overview of the Act, including the exemption provisions, and information regarding common barriers to inclusion faced by trans and intersex athletes.
- Exploring Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Inclusion in Australian Cricket, opens in a new tab, Ryan Storr, Grant O’Sullivan, Caroline Symons, et.al., Victoria University prepared for Cricket Australia and Cricket Victoria, (August 2017). Cricket Australia and Cricket Victoria commissioned the Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL) at Victoria University to examine the current climate, attitudes and initiatives towards LGBT inclusion within Australian cricket. In order to address these aims, the authors conducted a mixed methods study combining an online survey and in-depth interviews. A total of 338 respondents completed the survey, comprising cricket employees, players, coaches, administrators and volunteers. In addition, 17 in-depth interviews were conducted with key informants from the Victorian and Australian cricket communities. The findings demonstrate both challenges and opportunities with regard to LGBT inclusion in Australian cricket. The survey data show the prevalence of homophobia, biphobia and transphobia, and how homophobia also impacts heterosexual participants.
- Sport, Physical Activity and LGBT, opens in a new tab, Louise Englefield, Di Cunningham, Ali Mahoney, Pride in Sports for Sport England, (2016). In January 2016 Pride Sports was commissioned by Sport England to undertake a 10-week study examining the participation of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people in sport. The focus of the study was to review the existing research and reports into issues affecting LGBT participation in sport and physical activity and to evidence the impact of projects that are successfully addressing issues and delivering increased opportunities in sport. The study gave particular consideration to how provision, which has successfully engaged LGBT people, is also working to reduce physical inactivity and to engage those not previously participating in sport. This report summarises the work undertaken and makes recommendations to Sport England.
- Trans women’s experiences participating in sport, opens in a new tab, Lauryn Stewart, Paul O’Halloran, Jennifer Oates, Sport in Society, (5 August 2025). The 20 Australian transwomen who participated in this study provided the researchers with rich data indicating that sport can play an important role in the lives of many trans women, offering opportunities for improved physical health, reduced social isolation, and personal identity expression. However, participation in sport can also present significant challenges, including experiences of feeling unsafe and a lack of inclusivity. Given the potential impacts on mental health and the barriers to engagement, there is a pressing need for sporting bodies to implement more inclusive strategies, such as clear participation guidelines, trans-friendly spaces, and supportive team environments, to create equitable opportunities for all individuals.
- Strategies for Creating and Supporting Inclusive Programs, Places, and Policies for LGBTQ+ Youth in Sports, opens in a new tab, Hancock, Meg G., Pitcock, Bridget, King, Kristi M., ACSM's Health & Fitness Journal, Volume 23(2), pp.57-62, (March/April 2024). The article discusses the importance of inclusive sports programs for LGBTQ+ youth, emphasizing the benefits of physical activity and the existing disparities in participation. Topics include educating health professionals on LGBTQ+ issues, addressing barriers to sports participation, and advocating for inclusive policies and codes of conduct in sports organizations to create welcoming environments for all.
- Barriers to Participation in Organized Physical Activity Among LGBTQ+ Youth: Differences by Sexual, Gender, and Racial Identities, opens in a new tab, Benjamin Parchem, Jonathan Poquiz, Ryan L. Rahm-Knigge, et al., Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Volume 21(7), pp.698-706, (2024). LGBTQ+ youth engage in organized physical activity to a lesser degree than their cisgender and heterosexual counterparts. Existing literature on this organized physical activity disparity is limited, particularly with LGBTQ+ youth samples. The current analysis examined individual and systemic barriers to organized physical activity for LGBTQ+ youth across sexual, gender, and racial identities. A subsample of LGBTQ+ students (N = 4566) from the 2021 Dane County Youth Assessment completed items that measured barriers to organized physical activity and systemic factors (ie, family money problems and bias-based bullying) associated with access to organized physical activity. More than half of the sample did not participate in organized physical activity. Four profiles of LGBTQ+ youth were discerned based on self-reported barriers: high barrier (8%), bullied (16%), low interest or perceived skills (28%), and low barrier (48%). The low-barrier class included a greater proportion of LGBTQ+ youth who identified as White, or cisgender, or heterosexual as well as youth self-reporting higher organized physical activity. The high-barrier and bullied classes comprised more marginalized gender and sexual identities. LGBTQ+ youth experience individual and systemic barriers to organized physical activity, including inequitable access and bullying, and barriers are uniquely experienced across sexual, gender, and racial identities.
- “It Doesn’t Matter How You Identify, You Can Still Skate With Us”: Gender Inclusivity in Women's Flat Track Roller Derby, opens in a new tab, Hannah Kettley-Linsell, Janine Coates, Gemma Witcomb, Journal of Sport and Social Issues, Volume 47(5), (2024). Women's flat track roller derby is a grassroots full-contact sport underpinned by an explicit gender policy stating that any self-identifying woman can play, including those who are transgender and gender diverse (TGD). Adopting a queer-feminist lens, this research examined attitudes toward and experiences of gender inclusivity in the sport from the perspective of cis and TGD athletes in the United Kingdom. Reflexive thematic analysis, drawing on survey (n = 153) and interview (n = 20) data, examined how roller derby offers a space accepting of different identities; its underpinning principles surrounding body positivity and how it is perceived a social movement, involving a community of individuals sharing values of equality, diversity and inclusion. This research shows that an inclusive rhetoric surrounding gender not only engages TGD individuals in sport but offers a space for marginalised and alternative identities to participate together.
- The perspective of current and retired world class, elite and national athletes on the inclusion and eligibility of transgender athletes in elite sport, opens in a new tab, A.L. Shaw, A.G. Williams, G.K. Stebbings, et al., Journal of Sport Sciences, Volume 42(5), pp.381-391, (2024). There has been limited empirical study allowing athletes to voice their opinions on transgender participation in elite sport. This study surveyed 175 national, elite and world class athletes eligible to compete in the female category regarding transgender inclusion and eligibility. The study compared current Olympic versus current Olympic Recognised sports, elite versus world class, and current versus retired Olympic sport athletes. Most athletes favoured biological sex categorisation (58%) and considered it unfair for trans women to compete in the female category, except for precision sports. This view was held most strongly by world class athletes regarding their own sport (77% unfair, 15% fair). For trans men inclusion in the male category, most athletes considered it fair, except for Olympic sport athletes regarding contact sports (49% unfair, 27% fair) and sports heavily reliant on physical capacity (53% unfair, 29% fair). Notwithstanding those views, athletes (81%) believed sporting bodies should improve inclusivity for transgender athletes. Opinion varied somewhat according to career stage, competitive level and sport type. Nevertheless, athletes in the present study favoured categorisation by biological sex and did not support trans women eligibility for the female category in sports reliant on performance-related biological factors that differ between sexes.
- Transgender inclusion in competitive sport: athletes’ attitudes toward transgender athlete participation in intercollegiate sport, opens in a new tab, Chloe Goldbach, Stephanie Chambers-Baltz, Kristiana Feeser, et al., International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Volume 22(4), pp.802-824, (2024). Legislators who support current anti-transgender, sport-focused legislation argue that they are protecting cisgender athletes who oppose transgender inclusion. In particular, laws are being proposed and passed that aim to prevent transgender women from participating on women’s sports teams. However, little is known about whether athletes themselves are concerned about inclusion of transgender athletes. To fill this gap in the literature, we recruited 270 current and former intercollegiate athletes in the United States between September 2020 and April 2021 to participate in a quantitative study. Participants completed questions about scenarios involving a trans man athlete and a trans woman athlete, general attitudes toward transgender people, sport-specific attitudes toward transgender people, and religiosity. Our primary research questions were: do athletes generally support inclusion of binary transgender people in sport and how is support associated with variables measured in the study? Analyses included descriptive statistics, correlations, and t-tests. Results indicated that levels of support for transgender people were associated with a variety of sport-related variables. Namely, women were significantly more supportive of transgender athlete inclusion compared to men, and individuals who had prior contact with transgender people outside of support were significantly more supportive of transgender people both within and outside of sport. Participants demonstrated inconsistencies in beliefs that may be associated with unfamiliarity or misunderstandings of transgender terminology and issues. Policy implications and implications for transgender athletes are discussed.
- Human Rights and Inclusion Policies for Transgender Women in Elite Sport: The Case of Australia ‘Rules’ Football (AFL), opens in a new tab, Catherine Ordway, Matt Nichol, Damien Parry, et al., Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, (6 December 2023). The discourse inside and outside of sport in Australia and abroad on the participation of transgender women in female sport focuses on the principles of fairness, equity and the safety of competitors. These concerns commonly materialise (with little evidence) labelling transgender women as ‘cheats’, dominating female sport, strategically being coached in collision sports to intentionally hurt opponents or fraudulently transitioning with the sole aim of competing in elite women’s sport. Our research examines the process by which the Australian Football League (AFL) grappled with these competing narratives in developing a policy to permit the participation of transgender and gender diverse athletes in community and ‘elite’ competitions. It will be argued that the initial AFL process lacked consideration of the human rights of transgender women and did not provide the necessary resources required to ensure a safe and inclusive process for transgender women to engage with the AFLW competition. This article will also identify lessons which other sport governing organisations should heed in developing and implementing policies for the inclusion of transgender women in sport.
- Policy on the Run: The Development of Trans and Gender Diverse Inclusion Policies in Community Sport in Australia, opens in a new tab, Ryan Storr, Anna Posbergh, Sheree Bekker, in Trans Athletes’ Resistance, Greey, A.D., Lenskyj, H.J. (eds), Emerald Publishing, pp.43-55, (November 2023). This chapter examines the creation and development of trans inclusion policies in community sport in Australia. More specifically, it explores the impact of such policy, or lack thereof, on trans and gender diverse people who are currently engaged or wish to engage with community sport in the state of Victoria, Australia. This chapter evaluates the impact of Federal legislation and guidelines for the inclusion of trans and gender diverse people in Australian sport, and how sport organizations have responded in creating trans athlete policies for community sport participation. Next, we discuss the experiences and challenges for trans and gender diverse athletes playing and competing in community sport. We examine how these athletes work against institutional norms which typically reinforce a rigid gender binary. This chapter draws on a range of research projects in Australia by the first author and concludes with some recommendations for future research and both policy and practice.
- Fair Competition and Inclusion in Sport: Avoiding the Marginalisation of Intersex and Trans Women Athletes, opens in a new tab, Jonathan Cooper, philosophies, Volume 8(2), 28, (March 2023). Despite the reality of intersex individuals whose biological markers do not necessarily all point towards a traditional binary understanding of either male or female, the vast majority of sports divide competition into categories based on a binary notion of biological sex and develop policies and regulations to police the divide. In so doing, sports governing bodies (SGBs) adopt an imperfect model of biological sex in order to serve their particular purposes, which, typically, will include protecting the fundamental sporting value of fair competition. Yet, one potential consequence of enforcing such an approach would seem to be the exclusion or marginalization of individuals whose biological development does not fit within the binary model, whether due to genetics or through a choice to undergo medical intervention to better represent a chosen gender identity. Any such exclusion or marginalization will inevitably tend to undermine another fundamental value of sport, that of inclusivity. In the context of those with differences of sex development, SGBs appear to be faced with a difficult problem: dealing with a conflict between two fundamental values of sport. Different approaches to this problem have been suggested, with some academics proposing that sports organisations, in general, ought to prioritise fairness above, while others suggest the need to ‘balance’ competing values or even to prioritise inclusion over fairness. However, it is argued that any of these approaches are, in principle, justifiable as any sport should be free to prioritise or balance its own values. What seems more important for any SGB is the need for a rational and transparent justification of regulations that pursue fair competition at the expense of inclusivity. Furthermore, where fair competition and inclusivity are fundamental values, any such justification would seem to demand adherence to some basic norms. First, the regulations should be built on (and articulate) a consistent and principled basis of what ‘fair competition’ means in a particular sport. Second, any regulations should only exclude or restrict participation to the minimum degree necessary to achieve the sense of fair competition so articulated. Third, SGBs should be transparent about what their values are and where their priorities lie so that participants and other stakeholders are able to make an informed choice as to whether they wish to participate in, support, or be associated with a particular sport. With reference to the adoption of the Eligibility Regulations for Athletes with Differences of Sex Development (the ‘DSD Regulations’) by the International Association of Athletic Federations (IAAF), this article seeks to evaluate whether the approach of the IAAF satisfied these basic requirements.
- Examining World Rugby's transgender ban and the perspectives of cisgender women who play rugby in England, Canada and Australia, opens in a new tab, Richard Pringle, Erik Denison, Chapter 6 in ‘Justice for Trans Athletes: Challenges and struggles’, Ali Durham Greey, Helen Jefferson Lenskyj (eds), Emerald Publishing, pp.75-94, (2023). This chapter critically examines the unprecedented 2020 decision by World Rugby's (WR) primarily male leadership (92% of board members) to ban transgender (trans) women from playing women's rugby union. We examined the process that was followed and found a lack of consultation with those directly impacted: women. To address this critical gap in the policy development process we conducted interviews and focus groups with cisgender female rugby players (junior to elite) of mixed ethnic backgrounds living in England, Canada and Australia. This was done with the support of rugby governing bodies and professional rugby teams. We found no support for WR's blanket ban. Rugby players felt the policy was a contradiction of rugby's claims it is a ‘game for all’. The minority of players with safety concerns supported exclusion on a case-by-case basis, with exclusion justified in a small number of narrowly defined circumstances (e.g. elite male players who transitioned recently). Importantly, the women and girls questioned why rugby's leaders had chosen to focus their energy on ‘protecting’ them from trans athletes but had ignored serious problems which cause them direct harm, such as a lack of funding, pervasive sexist and homophobic behaviour, sexual harassment, and substandard coaching and training facilities (relative to men). Our findings are consistent with and they support the position of women's sports organizations which have called on WR's male leaders to discard their blanket ban and undertake a rigorous, science-driven, collaborative policy development process.
- Improving inclusion and well-being of trans and gender nonconforming collegiate student–athletes: foundational concepts from the National Collegiate Athletic Association Summit on Gender Identity and Student–Athlete Participation, opens in a new tab, Kroshus E, Ackerman KE, Brown M, et al., British Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 57(10), pp.564-570, (2023). The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Summit on Gender Identity and Student–Athlete Participation was convened to identify institutional/athletic department strategies that may support the well-being of trans and gender nonconforming (TGNC) collegiate student–athletes in the USA. The Summit’s purview did not include policy-level changes to eligibility rules. A modified Delphi consensus process was used to identify strategies for supporting collegiate TGNC student–athlete well-being. Key steps included an exploration phase (learning, generating ideas), and an evaluation phase (rating ideas in terms of their utility and feasibility). Summit participants (n=60) included individuals meeting at least one of the following criteria: current or former TGNC athlete, academic or healthcare professional with topical expertise, collegiate athletics stakeholder who would be involved in implementing potential strategies, representative from leading sports medicine organisation, or representative from relevant NCAA membership committee. Summit participants identified strategies in the following domains: healthcare practices (patient-centred care and culturally sensitive care); education for all stakeholders involved in athletics; and administration (inclusive language, quality improvement processes). Summit participants also proposed ways that the NCAA, through its existing committee and governance structures, could help support the well-being of TGNC athletes. NCAA-focused concepts were in the following domains: policy making processes; eligibility and transfer processes; resource development and dissemination; and visibility and support for TGNC athletes. The strategies developed represent important and relevant approaches that member institutions, athletic departments, NCAA committees, governance bodies and other stakeholders might consider in their efforts to support TGNC student–athlete well-being.
- Intersex awareness and education: what part can health and physical education bodies of learning and teaching play?, opens in a new tab Lisa Hunter, Agli Zavros-Orr, Annette Brömdal, et al., Sport, Education and Society, Volume 28(9), pp.1047-1067, (2023). The paper employs a recently developed Strategic Framework for intersex inclusion that promotes a positive whole-school approach, for educational institutions to be more inclusive, humane, safe and educationally relevant for people with intersex variations. This framework assists critical reflection on project findings. We argue that such engagement, as illustrated in this project’s scope, promotes a positive and diverse understanding about intersex in educational spaces, curriculum and pedagogies, guidelines, and policies, and ultimately reflect Australian Human Rights Commission recommendations and Australian anti-discrimination legislation.
- The politics of exclusion: Analyzing U.S. state responses to interscholastic transgender athletes, opens in a new tab, Spencer Harris, Scott Jedlicka, Roger Pielke Jr, et al., International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, Volume 15(4), pp.757-778, (2023). This paper provides a baseline characterisation of legislative action against transgender people participating in U.S. interscholastic sport. Using Kingdon’s multiple streams approach, we analyse legislation across the 50 states using data up to 1 October 2022. We also analyse qualitative data from public officials to document the framing and justification of legislative efforts. Our findings are clustered into four categories – legislators in states that have enacted legislation to prevent transgender participation in school sport (n = 19), those that have introduced legislation (n = 23), those that have not (yet) taken action (n = 7), and those that have progressive legislation requiring schools to permit participation by gender identity (n = 1). Our data suggest that national-level interest groups have played a critical role in policy diffusion across the states, leveraging the problem window in an intensely contested context, using sporting, judicial, and political focusing events to draw attention to the perceived problem. These dynamics have resulted in solutions searching for problems. Moreover, the issue of transgender inclusion in sport (a subset of legislative efforts against transgender people) has escalated a form of symbolic politics which is as much about partisan contestation as it is about addressing a perceived problem. While we recognise that the issue is complex, we believe that there are other solutions – beyond outright exclusion from school sport – that should be more fully explored. Because exclusionary policies claim to uphold sport’s fundamental values, sport organisations can lead on this issue by clearly defining these values and translating them into pragmatic policy solutions.
- Beyond the rainbow: a discourse analysis of English sports organisations LGBT+ equality diversity and inclusion policies, opens in a new tab, Bradley Spurdens, Daniel Bloyce, International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, Volume 14(3), pp.507-527), (2022). LGBT+ issues and advocacy are becoming more considered in various policies throughout society. However, sport is often described as a resistive space to such policies. This paper examines the effectiveness of current LGBT+ equality policies within English sports organisations. Specifically, 188 National Governing Body (NGB) policies were reviewed as well as 67 policies from other relevant organisations. From our analysis, we suggest that what is explicit throughout the policies is a partial stasis. This stasis takes the form of organisations gesturing towards change but failing to implement it concretely in their policies. We describe this process using the concept of ‘equality-proofing’ where just enough is done by organisations to gesture towards change or equality. Finally, recommendations for future policy praxis are considered.
- Specific Detriment: Barriers and Opportunities for Non-Binary Inclusive Sports in Scotland, opens in a new tab, Sonja Erikainen, Ben Vincent, Al Hopkins, Journal of Sport and Social Issues, Volume 46(1), pp.75-102, (2022). While non-binary gender identities have become increasingly visible in recent years, little research currently exists on the experiences that non-binary people have in sport, where most opportunities to participate are limited to two, mutually exclusive female and male categories. This article provides a starting point for addressing this gap, by reporting findings from a participatory scoping study that explored the barriers that non-binary people face in accessing sporting spaces, communities, and competitions. This study also identified strategies through which these barriers could be overcome, and non-binary inclusion facilitated. Taken together, these strategies suggest that genuine inclusion entails not only new ways of thinking about how gender operates in sport but also alternative ways of thinking about the meaning and value of sport itself.
- Support for LGBT diversity and inclusion in sport: a mixed methods study of Australian cricket, opens in a new tab, Ryan Storr, Grant O’Sullivan, Ramón Spaaij, et al., Sport Management Review, Volume 25(5), pp.723-747, (2022). his paper explores the extent and nature of support for LGBT diversity in sport, with an empirical focus on cricket in Australia. Using a mixed method research design, the authors combine an online survey (n = 337) and semi-structured interviews (n = 17) across various levels of competition and administration. Drawing on Avery’s theory of support for diversity, the findings demonstrate a perceived lack of institutional support through endorsement and activism for LGBT diversity but noticeable support from the grassroots cricket community. The survey data show a perceived need for increased efforts to include LGBT communities in cricket. Stakeholder interviews demonstrate a lack of understanding and awareness of LGBT diversity amongst administration at both the community and leadership levels. We contend that if cricket in Australia is to truly be a “sport for all”, and policy imperatives around diversity and inclusion are to be achieved, clear and consistent institutional support showing both commitment and action towards LGBT diversity must be demonstrated.
- Integrating transwomen athletes into elite competition: The case of elite archery and shooting, opens in a new tab, Blair Hamilton, Fergus Guppy, James Barrett, et al., European Journal of Sport Science, Volume 21(11), pp.1500-1509, (November 2021). The inclusion of transwomen into elite female sport has been brought into question recently with World Rugby banning transwomen from the elite female competition, aiming to prioritise safety over fairness and inclusion, citing the size, force and power-producing advantages conferred to transwomen. The same question is being asked of all Olympic sports including non-contact sports such as archery and shooting. As both these Olympic sports are the polar opposite to the contact sport of rugby in terms of the need to consider the safety of athletes, the IF of both archery and shooting should consider the other elements when deciding the integration of trans individuals in their sports. Studies on non-athletic transwomen have reported muscle mass and strength loss in the range of 5–10% after 1 year of their transition, with these differences no longer apparent after 2 years. Therefore, based on the current scientific literature, it would be justified for meaningful competition and to prioritise fairness, that transwomen be permitted to compete in elite archery after 2 years of GAT. Similarly, it would be justified in terms of shooting to prioritise inclusion and allow transwomen after 1 year of GAT given that the only negligible advantage that transwomen may have is superior visuospatial coordination. The impact of this considered integration of transwomen in elite sports such as archery and shooting could be monitored and lessons learned for other sports, especially where there are no safety concerns from contact with an opponent.
- Developing trans-athlete policy in Australian National Sport Organizations, opens in a new tab, L Stewart, P O’Halloran, J Oates, et.al., International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, Volume 13(4), pp.565-585, (August 2021). The purpose of this study was to explore the way Australian national sport organisations (NSOs) create, develop and implement their policies relevant to trans athletes. Representatives of nine NSOs were interviewed utilising in-depth semi-structured interviews. Four key themes emerged from the organisation spokespersons’ accounts: a) finding the right policy, b) underfunded and under resourced, c) challenges of educating employees and the public, and lastly, d) communication between NSOs and the trans athletic community. Findings revealed that only two NSOs reported had specific policies directed at trans athlete’s sport participation. Several NSOs indicated that they had plans to develop separate policies for the different levels of competition to assist trans athletes to participate in their sport as their identified gender. This is the first study to explore the perspective and views of NSOs on the participation of trans athletes in sport.
- Are we there yet? (Illusions of) Inclusion in sport for LGBT+ communities in Australia, opens in a new tab, Ryan Storr, Ruth Jeanes, Tony Rossi, et al., International Review for the Sociology of Sport, Volume 57(1), (June 2021). This paper reports findings from five recent studies related to gender and sexuality in Australian sport. It offers a challenge to widespread claims that exclusionary practices such as homo/bi/transphobia have been reduced or eliminated within sport settings. We suggest there remains much to be done towards ‘inclusion’, and that the concept itself is perhaps an illusion. Drawing on ‘diversity work’ theory we suggest inclusion is yet to be fully realised in sport-based research circles, and we argue that claims about the advanced progress in inclusion for LGBT+ people are problematic. Structures of language, institutional organisation and misaligned practices act as blocks to inclusion and fuel discrimination. We conclude by offering suggestions about where these can be addressed in sport and in research.
- “The poor cousin of inclusion”: Australian Sporting Organisations and LGBT+ diversity and inclusion, opens in a new tab, Ryan Storr, Sport Management Review, Volume 24(3), pp.410-420, (March 2021). This article contains an analysis of some of the main drivers of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT+) diversity and inclusion in a selection of sporting organisations. Anchoring the analysis within the context of critical diversity management, some of the key theoretical approaches to LGBT+ diversity and inclusion are discussed. Drawing upon current theoretical debates and discussions on the enactment of diversity and commitment/resistance to diversity within sport, the article foregrounds LGBT+ diversity and discusses the merits of the business case for promoting LGBT + diversity. Is the Australian sport sector doing enough to improve policies and practices for LGBT+ participants? This article critically assesses how Australian Sporting Organisations (ASO) move from engagement with LGBT + diversity to the full inclusion of LGBT+ people and concludes with insights into future directions for scholarship.
- It Is Not a Checking Off of Boxes: Creating LGBTQ Inclusive Spaces and Policies in Community Sport, opens in a new tab, Vikki Krane, Tanya Prewitt-White, Meredith A. Whitley, in 'Community Sport Coaching: Policies and Practice, opens in a new tab', Ben Ives, Paul Potrac, Laura Gale, Lee Nelson (eds.), Routledge, (2021). Community sport organisations can be a model of inclusion and outreach for their lesbian, gay male, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) members. Yet, gender and sexually diverse athletes often are invisible, excluded, or overlooked in community sport programmes. This chapter reflects upon the current state of community sport for LGBTQ participants and explores how to become more inclusive. Common non-discrimination and inclusive policies are shared along with suggestions for coach education and practices that can better prepare coaches to address LGBTQ inclusion and create an LGBTQ affirming environment. Lastly, we share a narrative of two coaches’ perspectives revealing inclusion strategies and wisdom from individuals embracing what it means to be an LGBTQ inclusive coach and leader. Applying an intersectional approach to LGBTQ inclusion, this chapter advocates proactive non-discrimination and inclusive policies, intentional education, and transformative leaders and coaches. This multipronged foundation will cultivate a healthy and compassionate environment where LGBTQ athletes can feel embraced, included, and affirmed.
- Leveraging Sports Events for LGBTQ2+ Inclusion: Supporting Innovation in Organizational Culture and Practices, opens in a new tab, Emily Romano, Kyle Rich, Dennis Quesnel, Case Studies in Sport Management, Volume 10(S1), pp.S36-40, (2021). In this case study, learners are introduced to Sloane, a diversity and inclusion officer who is working to create more inclusive sport and recreation opportunities in her community. A national-level sport event will be hosted in her community and provides an opportunity to elevate and accelerate the work she is already doing with sport and recreation organizations. Learners will develop an understanding of two key themes: LGBTQ2+ inclusion and event leveraging. Working through the case will require learners to think critically about sexuality and gender identity in the context of sport participation and organizations. Furthermore, learners will have the opportunity to think creatively about how they can support innovation in organizational cultures and practices with a view to fostering more inclusive, welcoming, and safe sport organizations.
- Open Categories in Sport: One Way to Decrease Discrimination, opens in a new tab, Irena Martínková, Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, Volume 14, pp.461-477, (June 2020). Jane English, a pioneer in feminist sport philosophy, suggested that female athletes should be allowed to ‘move up’ to the male category and compete against male athletes if they wished to. She drew this strategy from boxing, in which boxers in lower weight categories can choose to ‘move up’—to compete in a higher category (although this is not permitted in reverse—boxers cannot ‘move down’). This strategy could be used in other sports and for other categories, but it is not often chosen. It would suggest that talented athletes do not always need ‘category protection’—they do not need to be protected more than necessary, which raises the question of the justification of the category in the first place. On investigation, some justifications may have less to do with sport-rationality, than with reasons such as paternalism, ableism, ageism or sexism, or organizational reasons. This paper advocates the wider use of open and semi-open or at least overlapping categories (where possible), and it argues against the excessive use of closed categories—those made by prescribing set limits. The benefit is clear: athletes who are skilled enough to compete in the higher category should be allowed to ‘move up’, if they wish. With respect to sex/gender, this strategy would partly help to diminish the strength of the binary distinction, and so it can be considered a first and easy step towards a more integrated sport.
- A Case Study Exploring the Experiences of a Transgender Athlete in Synchronized Skating, a Subdiscipline of Figure Skating, opens in a new tab, Shannon Herrick, Meredith Rocchi, A. Lauren Couture, Journal of Sport and Social Issues, Volume 44(5), (May 2020). The inclusion of transgender athletes in sport challenges a number of long-standing cis-heteronormative beliefs within athletics at all levels of competition. There are limited studies examining the integration and experiences of transgender athletes within amateur sport. The following case study follows the experiences of a transgender synchronized figure skater, Mason, who was able to continue competing throughout his transition process. We conducted eight semi-structured one-on-one interviews with Mason, his teammates, his team manager, and his past and present coaches. All interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subject to thematic analysis which resulted in four overarching themes: (a) building inclusivity: “promote a safe space,” (b) acknowledging stress, (c) disclosure: “I didn’t want to talk about my past,” and (d) celebration. Results are interpreted as recommendations for coaches on how to adopt inclusive practices to better support transgender athletes.
- The Case for LGBT Diversity and Inclusion in Sport Business, opens in a new tab, George Cunningham, Umer Hussain, Sport and Entertainment Review, (January 2020). Sport is a paradox when it comes to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals. On the one hand, prejudice and discrimination limit the access and opportunities for LGBT athletes, coaches, and administrators. On the other hand, an increasing number of teams are reaching out to the LGBT community via various mechanisms. Further, sexual orientation diversity and inclusion is associated with improved experiences for athletes and coaches, irrespective of their sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, as well as performance gains for teams and sport organizations. The purposes of this review article are to (a) overview the influence of sexual orientation diversity and inclusion in sport, and (b) offer sport and entertainment managers actions to make their workplaces diverse and inclusive. The authors first identify why the benefits of LGBT diversity and inclusion exist and then highlight how sport organizations can create and sustain a diverse and inclusive environment. The authors’ research shows that multilevel efforts are needed, with a focus on individual interactions, leader behaviors, organizational policies, and the interaction with the broader environment in which the sport organization is situated. Collectively, the authors present a case for LGBT diversity and inclusion, showing sport and entertainment managers (a) the benefits of such practices, and (b) steps to create and sustain inclusiveness in their work environments.
- Building Inclusive Communities in Youth Sport for Lesbian-Parented Families, opens in a new tab, Dawn Trussell, Journal of Sport Management, Volume 34(4), ppp.367-377, (2020). This interpretative study examines the complexities of lesbian parents’ experiences in organized youth sport programs. Specifically, it seeks to understand youth sport as a potential site for social change that facilitates a sense of inclusive community for diverse family structures. Using thematic analysis, the author examines perspectives of nine participants from Australia, Canada, and the United States. Emphasis is placed on how the lesbian parents (a) negotiate heightened visibility, sexual stigma, and parental judgment; (b) foster social relationships through participation, volunteerism, and positive role models; and (c) create shared understanding toward building an inclusive sport culture. The findings call attention to the importance of intentional and unintentional acts (by families as well as sport organizations) that create a sense of community and an inclusive organizational culture. The connection of lesbian parents’ experiences to broader concepts, such as sexual stigma and transformative services, are also examined within the context of youth sport.
- “I’m Not an Expert, But ... ”: Perspectives on Aquatic Management for LGBTQ Participants, opens in a new tab. AR Anderson, E Knee, WD Ramos, Recreational Sports Journal, Volume 44(1), pp.24-37, (2020). The purpose of this study was to examine the initiatives that current aquatic managers in campus recreation are implementing to create environments that are inclusive to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) participation and to assess the barriers to such initiatives. The study utilized in-depth semistructured interviews with nine campus recreation aquatic managers to examine steps that are currently being taken when it comes to creating environments that are perceived to be open, or closed, to LGBTQ participants. A grounded theory–based process of data collection and analysis resulted in emergent themes. These themes included (a) “I am not an expert but... ,” (b) reactive programming and management, (c) inclusion as a general practice, and (d) the importance of gender-inclusive practices. Management strategies and implications for campus recreation aquatic managers around these emergent themes are discussed regarding the creating of inclusive environments for LGBTQ participants.
- Spaces and laces: insights from LGBT initiatives in sporting institutions, opens in a new tab, S. Lawley, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Volume 33(3), pp.502-514, (2020). The purpose of this paper is to examine LGBT exclusion from sporting institutions, examining this as a phenomenon which takes place in specific spaces within these institutions. A conceptual framework is developed which highlights the differences between initiatives to change heteronormative cultures at institutional levels and the levels of individual sporting spaces. This is applied to examples of heteronormative behaviour in sporting spaces and to diversity initiatives to promote LGBT participation in sport. The paper argues that change initiatives are only effective if they engage with individual spaces within sports institutions rather than at a blanket institutional level.
- “We want more diversity but…”: Resisting diversity in recreational sports clubs, opens in a new tab, Ramón Spaaij, Annelies Knoppers, Ruth Jeanes, Sport Management Review, Volume 23(3), pp.363-373, (2020). Participation in sport is highly valued by governments and policy makers. Policies and programs encourage participation of populations who are underrepresented in sport. In many countries sport participation is possible primarily under the auspices of voluntary sports clubs, many of which name demographic diversity as an organizational value. Underrepresented population groups continue to lag, however, in participating in sports clubs. Change has been slow in coming. Relatively little research focuses on resistance by those in positions of leadership to the entry or involvement of underrepresented or marginalized population groups into sports clubs. The purpose of this paper is to develop insight into why change may be so slow in coming even though demographic diversity is purportedly highly valued. Drawing on Raby’s (2005) conceptualizations of practices of resistance, on empirical research on diversity in recreational sports clubs and on work by Foucault, the authors identify six discursive practices that those in positions of leadership in sport clubs draw on to resist diversity: speech acts, moral boundary work, in-group essentialism, denial/silencing, self-victimization, and bodily inscription. The authors conclude that resistance to diversity in sport clubs has emerged from a confluence of discourses that enable noncompliance at the micro level with the use of a macro-level discourse of diversity.
- Experiences of trans persons in physical activity and sport: A qualitative meta-synthesis, opens in a new tab, Víctor Pérez-Samaniego, Jorge Fuentes-Miguel, Sofía Pereira-García, et.al., Sport Management Review, Volume 22(4), pp.439-451, (August 2019). The purpose of this paper was to map and provide new insights to existing qualitative research on experiences of trans people in physical activity and sport. Searches in international databases identified 604 documents related with those issues. Of these, the authors assessed 31 studies in accordance with a reading guide. Finally, 12 qualitative studies were selected. Key issues are condensed into four cross-cutting themes: (a) language; (b) facilities and spaces; (c) transgendering strategies; and (d) abjection. The identified issues show how trans persons diversely experience and manage situations of verbal discrimination, resistance, occupation of spaces, identification, and rejection. The paper concludes with insights based on the distinction between gender conformers and gender transformers, and implications for sport managers in order to enhance participation, enjoyment, and wellbeing of trans people in physical activity and sport.
- Participation-performance tension and gender affect recreational sports clubs’ engagement with children and young people with diverse backgrounds and abilities, opens in a new tab, Ramón Spaaij, Dean Lusher, Ruth Jeanes, et al., PLOS One, (April 2019). Sport participation has been shown to be associated with health and social benefits. However, there are persisting inequities and barriers to sport participation that can prevent children and young people with diverse backgrounds and abilities from accessing these benefits. This mixed methods study investigated how diversity is understood, experienced and managed in junior sport. The study combined in-depth interviews (n = 101), surveys (n = 450) and observations over a three-year period. The results revealed that a focus on performance and competitiveness negatively affected junior sports clubs’ commitment to diversity and inclusive participation. Gender and a range of attitudes about diversity were also strongly related. On average, we found that those who identified as men were more likely to support a pro-performance stance, be homophobic, endorse stricter gender roles, and endorse violence as a natural masculine trait. In addition, those who identified as men were less likely to hold pro-disability attitudes. These findings suggest that the participation-performance tension and gender affect to what extent, and how, sports clubs engage children and young people with diverse backgrounds and abilities.
- “My Ideal Is Where It Is Just Jane the Cricketer, Rather Than Jane the Gay Cricketer”: An Institutional Perspective of Lesbian Inclusion in Australian Cricket, opens in a new tab, Jonathan Robertson, Ryan Storr, Andrew Bakos, et.al., Journal of Sport Management, Volume 33(5), pp.393-405, (2019). The aim of this article was to develop a theoretical framework to aid the current understanding of social change practice. Drawing on concepts from institutional theory, the authors proposed and applied a theoretical framework to investigate social change at the intersection of gender and sexuality inclusion in Australian cricket. Qualitative techniques (interviews and document analyses) were utilized to investigate the trajectory of lesbian inclusion in Australian cricket over time. Starting from the perspective that institutional arrangements can be exclusionary (or biased) toward certain groups in society, this research investigated how the actions of institutional entrepreneurs can create more inclusive institutional arrangements. Theoretical and practical implications for future research are discussed.
- Diversity work in community sport organizations: Commitment, resistance and institutional change, opens in a new tab, Ramón Spaai, Jonathan Magee, Karen Farquharson, et al., International Review for the Sociology of Sport, Volume 53(3), pp.278-295, (2018). Diversity is a key term used in a range of public and private organizations to describe institutional goals, values and practices. Sport is a prominent social institution where the language of diversity is frequently and positively used; yet, this rhetoric does not necessarily translate into actual practice within sport organizations. This paper critically examines diversity work in community sports clubs. Drawing upon qualitative research at 31 amateur sports clubs in Australia, the findings show that diversity work in community sport organizations is often haphazard and accidental, rather than a strategic response or adaptation to policy. This paper concludes that while individual champions are critical to the promotion of diversity, persistent tensions and resistance arise when they seek to translate the language of diversity into institutional practice and culture change.
- LGBTQ parents’ experiences of community youth sport: Change your forms, change your (hetero) norms, opens in a new tab, Dawn Trussell, Laura Kovac, Jen Apgar, Sport Management Review, Volume 21(1), pp.51-62, (2018). This interpretive study sought to critically examine lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer (LGBTQ) parents’ experiences of community organized youth sport. Using a constant comparative method of data analysis, the authors examined perspectives of participants from Australia, Canada, and the United States. Three emergent themes best reflected the parents’ experiences: (a) anticipating sexual stigma and finding accepting communities; (b) confronting assumptions of heterosexuality; and (c) educating but not flag waving. Emphasis is placed on the parents intersecting social identities and notions of privilege (e.g., socio-economic resources and the ability to live in socially progressive areas), and how it altered their experiences within the community youth sport context. The findings call attention to the responsibility of youth sport organisations to create a climate of social change through inclusive language, behaviours, and program design.
- Although there was an underlying fear of sexual stigma, in general participants found the youth sport organisational culture to be a space of tolerance (if not acceptance). What did remain problematic, however, was a culture of heterosexism and sexual prejudice that was entrenched within the youth sport culture (e.g., non-inclusive forms, non-inclusive special events/programs, curious eyes from coaches and other parents, constantly having to come ‘out’). This may have implications on the parents (and consequently their children’s) short- and long-term involvement with a community sport organisation.
- In terms of application for practice, the findings help provide cultural competence for youth sport organisations to reduce stigmas, oppression, and heterosexism for parents who identify as LGBTQ and their children. For example, the use of inclusive and non-heteronormative language with policy and form development (i.e., parent 1, parent 2 instead of mother, father) as well as special events (e.g., parent-child dinner instead of father-daughter dinner) would provide a mechanism of support in building an inclusive community. Moreover, the findings from this study have implications for program design and management, indicating that parents seek integration into existing programs rather than mirror specialized gay and lesbian adult leagues for their children.
- “We are a sport for all Australian's” : exploring the non-performativity of institutional speech acts around LGBTI+ diversity in Australian sporting organisations, opens in a new tab, Storr, R., Parry, K. D., Kavanagh, E., Abstract Book Of The 15th European Association For Sociology Of Sport Conference: Sport, Discriminations And Inclusion: Challenges To Face (Eass 2018), May 23-26, 2018, Bordeaux, France, pp.67, (2018). LGBTI+ rights have been widely discussed in Australian society. The recent postal survey surrounding marriage equality resulted in many sporting organisations making public 'institutional speech acts' (Ahmed, 2012) surrounding their commitment to LBTI+ diversity. This paper reports on social media and policy analyses of the organisations and their public support and institutional commitment to LGBTI+ diversity. We find that the claims made by several sporting organisations around their institutional commitment to LGBTI+ diversity have not been supported by actions. The disjuncture is particularly apparent when national benchmarking criteria, such as the Pride in Sport Index are considered. This paper argues that the organisations are playing 'institutional catch up' regarding their commitment to LGBTI+ diversity. Here, there are distinct differences between what the institution says they do, and what they actually do. We argue that a lack of institutional commitment to LGBTI+ diversity is displayed through 'non- performative institutional speech acts' (Ahmed, 2006; Bury, 2015). These speech acts are not supported by deeds, have no impact, and serve to contradict the public commitment to LGBTI+ diversity. We conclude by contending that if sports organisations are to improve their Pride in Sport Index scores, they must enact policies which seek to make their sport more inclusive for LGBTI+ Australians across all levels of sport.
- Implementation of Promising Practices for LGBTQ Inclusion: A Multilevel Process, opens in a new tab, Daniel Theriault, Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, Volume 35(3), (2017). Recreation professionals have moral, fiscal, and legal incentives to ensure that individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) have access to safe, beneficial services that respond to their unique needs. In this overview of education, social work, diversity management and leisure studies literatures, the author presents potential constraints and supports that may arise during the implementation of promising practices for LGBTQ inclusion. Those factors are organized according to Ferdman’s (2014) multilevel inclusion framework. At the individual level, participants’ perceptions of inclusion are shaped by the ways their various identities are experienced in recreation contexts. Practitioners who focus solely on LGBTQ identities may miss opportunities to support participants through significant challenges such as racism or ableism. At the interpersonal level, heterosexuals are often motivated by past experiences with discrimination to advocate with LGBTQ youth. However, some heterosexual employees may require training to effectively advocate with LGBTQ youth. At the group level, recreation professionals should expect both resistance to and support for inclusion initiatives. Understanding resistance and points of support within and outside of the organization may prepare practitioners for roadblocks and assist them in leveraging points of support. At the leadership level, recreation administrators exert unique influence on inclusion initiatives by modeling desired behaviors and establishing organizational priorities. Administrators who lack experience or comfort with LGBTQ populations may unintentionally stall inclusion efforts. At the organizational level, administrators must be cognizant of both who an organization has historically served and how organizational culture can support or undermine inclusion programs. At the societal level, cultural norms about LGBTQ identities influence who is authorized to speak and how LGBTQ participants should be treated. Recreation practitioners who intentionally disrupt these norms by implementing promising practices may frame their program as a site for social justice. Practitioners who pursue inclusion in light of the above issues may be able to enhance the intended outcomes of promising practices and avoid unintended consequences.
- Inclusive Spaces and Locker Rooms for Transgender Athletes, opens in a new tab, George B. Cunningham, Erin Buzuvis and Chris Mosier, Kinesiology Review, Volume 7(4), pp.365-374, (2017). The purpose of this article is to articulate the need for a strong commitment to transgender inclusion in sport and physical activity, including in locker rooms and team spaces. The authors begin by defining key constructs and offering a theoretical overview of stigma toward transgender individuals. The focus then shifts to the changing opportunities for transgender athletes at all participation levels, case law and rulings germane to the topic, and the psychological, physical, and social outcomes associated with inclusion and exclusion. Next, the authors present frequently voiced concerns about transgender inclusion, with an emphasis on safety and privacy. Given the review, the authors present the case for inclusive locker rooms, which permit access by transgender athletes to facilities that correspond to their gender identity. The authors conclude with the official AKA position statement—“The American Kinesiology Association endorses inclusive locker rooms, by which we mean sex-segregated facilities that are open to transgender athletes on the basis of their gender identity”—and implications for sport and physical activity.
- Transgender and gender nonconforming athletes: Creating safe spaces for all, opens in a new tab, Morris J and Van Raalte J, Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, (2 June 2016). Transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) athletes face a number of challenges in a sport setting. This article provides information on how coaches can create more welcoming environments by using appropriate language, educating team members, and offering social support for TGNC athletes.
- Educating Coaches on Their Role in the Prevention of Homophobic Bullying in Adolescent Sport, opens in a new tab, Lana Jade McCloughan, Emma Louise Mattey, Stephanie J. Hanrahan, International Sport Coaching Journal, Volume 2(3), pp.317-329, (2015). The purpose of this paper is to critically discuss current views on coaches’ roles in homophobic bullying prevention in adolescent sport and provide an example of a program designed to upskill coaches in this important area. A review of the prevalence of homophobic bullying in sport is provided. The importance of the role of the coach in addressing bullying in adolescent sport is then discussed. Coach education and learning theory are examined and an example of a coach education workshop on homophobic bullying prevention is detailed. A summary of the evaluation completed by the coach participants of the education workshop is provided, with potential modifications to the workshop noted. The need for intervention is linked back to the literature in the conclusion.
- Creating and Sustaining Workplace Cultures Supportive of LGBT Employees in College Athletics, opens in a new tab, George Cunningham, Journal of Sport Management, Volume 29(4), pp.426-442, (2014). The purpose of this study was to understand (a) how participants conceptualized lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) inclusiveness in their athletic departments, (b) the antecedents of such workplace environments, and (c) the outcomes associated with inclusion. To do so, the author conducted a collective case study of two college athletic departments located in the U.S. Northeast. Participants described the athletic departments as characterized by community and cohesion, respect and inclusion, and success oriented. Various antecedents contributed to these workplace environments, including those at the individual level, leader behaviors, inclusive organizational policies, and macro-level influences. Finally, while some negative outcomes were identified, LGBT inclusion was predominantly associated with a host of positive outcomes for the employees, athletes, and organizations as a whole.
- Griffith University’s Sport Launches Pride In Sport, opens in a new tab, Griffith University, (2 March 2023). Griffith Sport launched its Pride in Sport Strategy, which embraces diversity of gender, bodies and sexualities and demonstrates a commitment to create environments that are visibly inclusive and welcoming. In line with the strategy which includes a new code of behaviour, Griffith Sport staff have undertaken Ally training and Griffith Sport staff will wear Ally badges as part of their uniform. ’Safe Space’ stickers will feature on all Griffith Sport facilities establishing an expectation that there is a clear code of behaviour for everyone who engages and interacts with Griffith Sport events, programs and facilities.
- Griffith Sport Pride: Strategic Plan 2023-2025, opens in a new tab, Griffith University Sport, (2023).
- Griffith Sport Pride: Code of Behaviour, opens in a new tab, Griffith University Sport, (2023).
- Pride in Squash Roadmap 2022-2026, opens in a new tab, Squash Australia, (2022). Through this strategy, Squash Australia will do all it can to address behaviours to ensure that all individuals, are treated with respect, courtesy and fairness, and that the standards expected by our community are maintained at all times.
- Creating an LGBTI+ Inclusive Club, opens in a new tab, Play by the Rules, (5 June 2025). A free, interactive online training course suitable for coaches, administrators, officials, players and volunteers. The course is short, user-friendly and features case studies, practical scenarios and examples, and a quiz.
- Interactive scenario: Homophobia and Sexuality Discrimination, opens in a new tab, Play by the Rules, (4 February 2025). This short scenario explores how a club responds to concerns that one of their coaches is gay. The scenario explores issues that can arise when dealing with questions relating to homosexuality in sport. As you read through the material think about what you would do in this situation.
- Pride in Our Workforce resource, opens in a new tab, Bournemouth University for Energise Me and Sport England, (2021). This resource is designed to support you and your team (workforce) to become more inclusive. It highlights potential barriers to LGBT+ communities enjoying physical activity and offers recommendations to help you make positive changes. Our research reveals that participants from LGBT+ communities look for signs that organisations are inclusive, such as displaying a rainbow flag. Displaying a sign such as this comes with a responsibility to actually ‘be inclusive’. Throughout this resource we aim to challenge you on this - not to highlight where you are going wrong, but to allow you as individual organisations to identify gaps in knowledge or actions and learn how to improve. You will probably find that any changes made will not only benefit members from LGBT+ communities but everyone else as well.
- OUTSPORT Toolkit: Supporting sport educators in creating and maintaining an inclusive sport community based on diversity of gender identities and sexual orientations, opens in a new tab, Laszlo Foldi, Outsport project, (2019). This training toolkit is designed to assist sport operators (including educators and managers) in innovatively preventing and tackling anti-LGBTI hate crime and discrimination and their causes, by fostering capacity building and education. The Toolkit consists of 5 thematic sections, including a chapter presenting the main findings of the European research into the experiences of LGBTI people in sport; a chapter on specific empowering pedagogic approach with high potentials; a collection of concrete educational tools that support coaches and teachers in the creation of SOGI inclusive sport communities; and a collection of existing examples of non-discriminative organisational best practices.
- Leading the Way: Working with LGBT Athletes and Coaches, opens in a new tab (2nd ed.), Jennifer Birch-Jones, Canadian Women and Sport, (2017). A comprehensive resource designed for coaches and is based on the lived experiences of Canadian athletes and coaches. The resource highlights current issues in Canadian sport, from playground to podium, and aims to make sport a more welcoming place for those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans (transgender), two-spirited, queer or questioning (LGBTQ). Leading the Way provides information to help coaches understand LBGTQphobia and the negative impact it has on everyone in their sport. It suggests best practices for creating a sport environment that is safe and respectful for all.
- Athlete Ally , opens in a new tabbelieves that everyone should have equal access, opportunity, and experience in sports — regardless of your sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression. Our mission is to end the rampant homophobia and transphobia in sport and to activate the athletic community to exercise their leadership to champion LGBTQI+ equality.
- Athlete Equality Index, opens in a new tab (AEI). Initially conducted biannually in 2017 and 2019 and now updated regularly on this evergreen site, the AEI is a first-of-its-kind report providing a comprehensive look at how NCAA D-I institutions are supporting their LGBTQ student-athletes, coaches, administrators, staff, and fans.
- SBS Sport Inclusion 2024: June Pride Month, opens in a new tab, SBS Sport, (June 2024). SBS Sport has partnered with Pride in Sport Australia to showcase some of Australia's most amazing LGBTQ athletes, from a range of sporting codes. The four-part video series celebrates LGBTQ athletes and highlights the importance of LGBTQ inclusion in sport.
- Episode 1: The Beginning - We hear about how they began their sporting journey and the various challenges and inspirations that encouraged them to achieve their sporting goals.
- Episode 2: The Choice - The series explores the circumstances around peoples’ decisions or otherwise to come out publicly. We hear about the athlete’s journeys, sharing moments of feeling, the power of inclusion and why it’s important to be included.
- Episode 3: The Challenge - We explore the challenges LGBTQ+ athletes still face and what we can do moving forward, through the power of inclusion.
- Episode 4: The Future - We hear about the important role that allies play in making sport more inclusive and welcoming for everyone.
- Equal the Contest, opens in a new tab [documentary film], Umbrella Entertainment, (2024). When a 42 year old, non-binary filmmaker joins a new local women’s footy club in Regional Victoria a simple desire to play becomes a complex journey of inclusion and belonging. An unexpected turn means the team has to fight to play. Their campaign challenges age old sporting traditions and joins the wider movement for gender equity.
- AIS Pride Month Discussion Panel, Gracie Elvin, Former Professional Cyclist and AIS Thrive with Pride Ambassador; Christine Granger, CEO, Proud 2 Play; Tom Winter, Relationship Manager, Pride in Sport, Australian Sports Commission, (22 June 2022). Hear from sports leading the charge, the latest insights from across the sector and exciting initiatives set to launch. Hosted by Jayde de Bondt, AIS Community Engagement Manager & Co Chair, Victorian LGBTIQ+ Taskforce, and featuring an exciting panel including Proud2Play CEO Christine Granger, Pride in Sport Relationship Manager Tom Winter and former professional cyclist and AIS Thrive with Pride ambassador Gracie Elvin.
- Why Homophobia in Sports Campaigns Fail | The Science of Norms and Attitudes, opens in a new tab, MindfulThinks, YouTube, (3 December 2020). This video was made in collaboration with researchers from Monash University and the University of British Columbia. We will be covering topics surrounding homophobic language in sports and how changing social norms can help make the LGBTQ community feel more welcome.
- Social Norms and Prejudiced Language in Sports The Disconnect of Actions and Beliefs, opens in a new tab, Sport Inclusion Project, YouTube, (2 November 2020). In this video we'll be looking at how homophobic and prejudiced language leads to decreased participation and feelings of acceptance in sports in the LGBT community, and how changing our social norms can help fix this problem.
- Well Played, opens in a new tab, Twenty10 inc GLCS NSW, Vimeo, (2020). Well Played is a short film highlighting the importance of diversity and inclusion in sport and physical activity and the positive impact it has on young people's health and wellbeing.
- Pride Cup: harnessing the power of sport, opens in a new tab, AFL Women's, YouTube, (25 June 2019). From humble beginnings as a rainbow 50m line, the Pride Cup has grown and grown, to send a strong message of hope, inclusion and acceptance to LGBTI+.
- Homophobia in sport and the Pride in Sport Index, opens in a new tab, Andrew Purchas, Diversity and Inclusion in Sport Forum 2016, (October 2016). Andrew Purchas from the Bingham Cup talks about homophobia in sport and the Pride in Sport Index at the 2016 Diversity and inclusion in Sport Forum.
- Discrimination, Ben Hartung, Play By The Rules Forum, (19 April 2012). Fair go, sport! is a Hockey Victoria project that’s aimed at increasing the awareness of sexual and gender diversity and promoting safe and inclusive environments in hockey.
Access to resources Where possible, direct links to full-text and online resources are provided. However, where links are not available, you may be able to access documents directly by searching our licenced full-text databases (note: user access restrictions apply). Alternatively, you can ask your institutional, university, or local library for assistance—or purchase documents directly from the publisher. You may also find the information you’re seeking by searching Google Scholar, opens in a new tab.