AboutContact UsRegister

Workforce

Inclusive organisations, that make all participants safe and welcome are an important facilitator of sport participation.

Welcoming and inclusive organisations – that are safe, free of harassment and discrimination, and with employees and volunteers who know about and support LGBTIQ+ people and communities – are an important facilitator of sport participation. 2, 6, 15, 18, 43, 77

Alternatively, when organisations, staff, coaches, teachers, or volunteers have negative attitudes towards LGBTIQ+ people, lack empathy, confidence, and/or training in appropriate engagement and behaviour it is a significant barrier. 10, 15

There is a clear need and desire for additional education and training for people who work in sport (both paid and volunteer). This would help to better meet the needs of LGBTIQ+ people, effectively implement inclusion or anti-harassment and discrimination policies, and build new cultural norms. 2, 4, 6, 10, 15, 18, 21, 25, 29, 43, 53, 67, 80, 89, 119

74% of respondents in the 2023 Pride in Sport National Survey thought that training in LGBTIQ+ inclusion should be mandatory for anyone who managed or supervised other people. 15

Coaches

Research often highlights the significant influence that coaches have – both positive and negative – in fostering the behaviour and norms of their teams. 18, 25, 36, 68, 86, 88, 90, 112, 113, 114, 115

A 2021 Australian study found that among LGBTIQ+ participants who experienced harassment or assault at sport in the previous 12 months, nearly 17% of perpetrators were coaches. 35 And in the 2015 Out on the Fields research, 37% of young gay Australian athletes remained in the closet due to fear of discrimination from coaches and officials. 30, 68

A 2023 Canadian resource highlights five guiding principles for coaches to develop inclusive sport environments: 86

  • Modelling respectful behaviours on and off the field.
  • Ensuring the environment is safe (physically, emotionally, psychologically).
  • Being an ally and leading by example.
  • Being fair and applying the same standards to everyone.
  • Respecting individual’s privacy through treating any knowledge or conversations about gender and sexuality as privileged.

Because of their potential influence, coaches should be a key focus of workforce inclusion and allyship training. 25, 86, 100, 115

LGBTIQ+ inclusion in the workforce

It is also important to increase the number and visibility of LGBTIQ+ people who are actively working in the sector (both paid and volunteer). This signals that sport is a safe and welcoming environment for LGBTIQ+ participation, provides visible role models to encourage engagement in playing and non-playing roles, increases the available talent pool, and provides valuable diversity of thinking and experience to improve organisational outcomes. 2, 6, 18, 21, 77, 78, 80, 89, 90

Some studies have shown that LGBTIQ+ employees in sport and active recreation organisations can be disadvantaged, especially in coaching and leadership roles, and often feel that they are not welcome or don’t belong. 15, 31, 64, 65, 77, 80, 116

  • The 2023 Pride in Sport National Survey found that LGBTQ respondents were less likely to feel engaged with or like they belonged in their organisation. They also felt less productive and were less likely to feel mentally well or that they could be themselves compared to those not of diverse gender or sexuality. 15
  • A 2024 New Zealand survey of the play, active recreation and sport workforce found that around 8% of the sector’s workforce identified as part of the rainbow community. They were less likely to believe that they could speak up without being punished or humiliated; less likely to trust their organisation to handle integrity issues effectively; more likely to experience harassment, discrimination or bullying; and more likely to see barriers to career progression than other members of the workforce. 65
  • A 2020 UK study found that LGBTIQ+ individuals were less likely to work in the physical activity and sport workforce. 18
  • A 2017 study of cricket in Australia found that respondents overall believed that LGBT people were more accepted as volunteers or players than in leadership or coaching roles. When looking at which roles LGBT participants were most accepted in, LGBT respondents thought they were most accepted as players, while non-LGBT respondents felt LGBT staff were more accepted. 53

To increase workforce engagement, organisations need to collaborate with LGBTIQ+ individuals and communities and actively work to ensure open, two-way communication about what is needed and wanted. They should also ensure that management practices and policies are inclusive and support individuals to start and remain engaged. 29, 53, 116, 77, 78, 80

Resources and reading

  • The AFL's never had an openly gay player. Insiders say a culture of homophobia lingers, opens in a new tab, Louise Milligan, ABC Four Corners, (21 August 2023). Michael O'Donnell's silence set in when he was 13. Puberty hit him with all its force and with it, the realisation he wasn't like the other kids in his suburban Aussie rules football club in Melbourne's eastern suburbs. "I started realising who I was as a person," O'Donnell tells Four Corners. He didn't see himself in the broader game either. There were no players, no coaches — no-one was openly gay. It wasn't just on the field that O'Donnell felt he wasn't accepted. He grew up watching the football panel shows and hearing the words from the commentary boxes. He heard everything from smutty jokes and innuendo to blatant homophobia. O'Donnell has cast off the shame. He's telling his story because he wants every single kid starting out in the sport to feel safe.
  • ‘I can’t stand silent’: Why Trent Robinson is stepping up fight against homophobia in sport, opens in a new tab, Dan Walsh, Sydney Morning Herald, (22 April 2023). “It’s not about them coming out, it’s about them coming in.” Trent Robinson doesn’t know if he’s coached gay players during a 10-year career as a three-time, title-winning Roosters coach, or in his formative years before that throughout the NRL and Super League. The statistics and law of averages say he has. As part of the Pride in Sport Coach for All program, Sydney Roosters coach Trent Robinson discusses the importance of sporting environments being a place where everyone feels included, regardless of their sexuality. With Ian Roberts still the only openly gay male player in the code’s history, and few other examples in Australian men’s sport, Robinson is careful with his language. “Because we can’t be waiting for someone from the LGBTQ+ community to walk into our locker room and change the environment,” he says. “It doesn’t matter if I, or anyone else, has any gay players in their team. It’s about anyone walking into that environment and not having to change who they are. It should be inclusive, so they can walk in and say, ‘Yeah, this is a place for me’.” In the largest international study of gay athletes and homophobia in sport [Out on the Fields study], surveying more than 9000 gay and straight participants, the perception was overwhelming. The study showed the athletes felt sport wasn’t welcoming for LGBTQ+ people.
  • Call for councils to join battle to make sport safe for LGBTIQA+ community, opens in a new tab, Matilda Marozzi, ABC Radio Melbourne, (18 February 2023). The 2016 consensus statement from the International Olympic Committee also found the presence of psychological abuse can be a "gateway" to physical and sexual abuse. While it is clear abusive language is used at sporting clubs and that it is incredibly harmful, what has been harder to establish is how to stop it. Dr Denison believes the education wasn't effective because it wasn't being backed up by club leaders on a day-to-day basis. "The coaches, who are volunteers, were not enforcing policies that ban this very harmful language," Dr Denison says. To stop homophobic language and make clubs safe, Dr Denison says change needs to come from the top — from the (mostly) men who are running the clubs, and volunteering as coaches. He wants councils, which often run sporting facilities and fund local clubs, to step in and help clubs comply with child safety standards. Dr Denison says they can do this by introducing "safe sports officers" to attend training and matches and help drive positive change — as recommended by the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.
  • ‘Players need to understand this language is hurtful’: Anti-homophobia training in sport had no effect, opens in a new tab, Konrad Marshall, Sydney Morning Herald, (11 February 2023). The landmark peer-reviewed study – Effectiveness of an educational intervention targeting homophobic language by young male athletes: a cluster randomised controlled trial – calls into question the usefulness of the standard sensitivity training model used not just in sport but also in most workplaces, and provides yet more evidence of an intractable social problem. Young Victorian rugby players involved in the study reported that the number of slurs they heard in the two weeks after the intervention had actually increased. Other studies have shown that engaging leaders within sporting teams, and having those captains and coaches lead conversations about homophobia, might be the most effective method of all. Certainly, more effective than using external facilitators. Messengers such as Humphries – but also his supportive coach Dean Vickerman, and captain Chris Goulding – then become more important than the message itself.
  • Positive sport experiences of gay men, opens in a new tab, Jake Quinton and Kyle Rich, SIRC, (7 December 2022). In this blog, we discuss our research, in which we interviewed 9 gay men between the ages of 30 and 45 to examine their experiences in organized sports, how they navigate stressors, and ultimately how they derive well-being from sport participation. Finding community is at the core of why many participants in our study participate in sports.
    • Creating inclusive sport environments requires recognizing the diversity of experiences that participants bring to sport contexts and the complex ways that people derive well-being through sport. Sport organizers must consider factors within their organizations and their communities more broadly when developing inclusion initiatives. Establishing policies that do not tolerate homophobia and actively shape safe and welcoming spaces for participation are important.
    • Our research suggests that positive sport experiences are derived not only from participating, but from building relationships with a range of people, having and being role models, and being competitive and successful in sport itself. Therefore, organizers should also consider how they can foster broader organizational cultures that support and value contributions of diverse participants as players, coaches, leaders, and peers.
  • How coaches and sport organizations can create a better experience for LGBTQ+ youth, opens in a new tab, Dawn E. Trussell, Kyle Rich, Jake Quinton, SIRC, (29 June 2022). Participating in sport can have many benefits for LGBTQ+ youth. Sport has the potential to bring joy, distraction and mindfulness that frees LGBTQ+ youth from worry and fear in other domains of their lives. Sport can also provide important social connections and support for LGBTQ+ youth as they negotiate coming out. In this blog, we explain why LGBTQ+ youth often feel unsafe in sport. Aligned with a movement to understand the nuances of different gender and sexual identities we focus on LGBTQ+ identities. We also recommend 5 strategies that coaches and other sport leaders should consider to create more inclusive cultures in their teams and organizations for LGBTQ+ and transgender, and queer or questioning (LGBTQ+) identities.

  • Inclusion in Sport Coaching Resource: LGBTQI2S, opens in a new tabviasport British Columbia, (2023). As a coach, you are largely responsible for creating and maintaining a culture in which all participants will thrive. In creating a safe and welcoming space for your LGBTQI2S participants, you will be making a significant impact on their lives, as well as benefiting the other participants you coach.
  • A Coach's Guide: LGBTQI2S Sport Inclusion, opens in a new tabCoachNB, (2022). Coach NB’s objective with this resource is to provide guiding principles to help coaches create more inclusive environments, practices and policies in their sport organizations for LGBTQI2S athletes, administrators, coaches, officials and volunteers. This guide is designed to support organizations interested in becoming more inclusive to all sexual orientations, gender identities and gender expressions.
  • 2SLGBTQI Sports Inclusion: Playbook to breaking down barriers, opens in a new tabEgale, (2021?) . Being able to practice 2SLGBTQI allyship in sport starts by understanding the barriers to 2SLGBTQI inclusion and accessibility. This resource lays out the different barriers of discrimination that exist in sports and provides tips and tricks on how to foster a more inclusive sport environment. Whether you are a coach, athlete, administrative staff, parent, or a fan, this resource will start you off in thinking about strategies for the inclusion work we all have a part to play in.
  • Guidelines for the inclusion of transgender and gender diverse people in sport, opens in a new tab, Australian Human Rights Commission in partnership with the Australian Sports Commission and the Coalition of Major Professional and Participation Sports, (June 2019). These Guidelines have been developed to provide guidance to sporting organisations on promoting the inclusion and participation of transgender and gender diverse people in sport. The Guidelines provide information about the operation of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) (the Act) in relation to unlawful and permissible discrimination on the basis of sex and gender identity, sexual harassment, and victimisation as well as practical guidance for promoting inclusion in line with fundamental human rights-based principles. Areas of focus include leadership, inclusion policies, codes of conduct, uniforms, facilities, and collecting and using personal information.

  • Pride Cup, opens in a new tab works with all levels of sport to build a world where every LGBTI+ person feels included, accepted and proud to be who they are. When Jason Ball publicly came out as gay in 2012, his teammates from the Yarra Glen Football Netball Club wanted to show him they had his back. The team came up with the idea to stage a Pride Cup, with players wearing rainbow jumpers, and 50 metre lines painted in rainbow colours. It was an event that galvanised the entire community and became the inspiration for the now annual AFL Pride Game, first played between St Kilda FC and Sydney Swans in 2016. Since hitting the national stage, communities across Australia have joined the movement, with Pride Cups being expanded into other sporting codes nationally.
  • Proud 2 Play, opens in a new tab focuses on increasing LGBTIQ+ engagement in sport, exercise and active recreation. To do this, we work with all levels of the sporting community, from individual participants and grassroots communities, to state and national sporting organisations. We seek to encourage LGBTIQ+ people (as well as their allies, friends and families) to participate and engage in sport and exercise by providing structured opportunities and pathways for them to do so. Engagement is not limited to just actively participating in sport; the physical, mental and social benefits of sport should be experienced by active participants, volunteers, coaches and officials. Proud2Play focusses on Education, Policy, Events, Research and Partnerships.
  • LEAP Sports Scotland, opens in a new tab (Leadership, Equality and Active Participation in Sports for LGBTI people in Scotland) works for greater inclusion for LGBTI people in sport and against homophobia, biphobia and transphobia in a sports context. We are committed to breaking down the structural, social and personal barriers which prevent lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) people across the country from accessing, participating and excelling in Scottish sports. Website provides a wide variety of information, programs and resources including:
    • LGBTIQ+ 101, opens in a new tab, (2020). A resource for sports coaches, P.E Teachers, and peers to learn how to best support and include LGBTIQ+ people in their teams.

  • 2024 Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Survey: Play, Active Recreation and Sport Workforce, opens in a new tab, Angus and Associates for Sport New Zealand Ihi Aotearoa, (July 2024). The 2024 Diversity, Equity and Inclusion survey follows an earlier survey in 2020 and is designed to provide a current view of the makeup and experiences of people working (as paid employees or board members) in the play, active recreation and sport sector. For this report people who identify as members of rainbow communities are those who selected ‘Another gender’ for the Gender identity question, and/or selected ‘gay or lesbian’, or ‘bisexual’ or ‘other’ for the Sexual orientation question.
    • Relative to New Zealand’s adult population as a whole, the workforce includes higher proportions of women and people who identify as part of rainbow communities. 8% of the sector’s workforce are people who identify as members of rainbow communities; 90% Heterosexual, 3% Gay or lesbian, 3% Bisexual, 1% Other, 2% Prefer not to say.
    • Compared with others, people who identify as members of rainbow communities are less likely to agree that ‘I can speak up without being punished or humiliated’, and ‘the organisation puts its commitment to DEI into practice’. They are more likely to have no trust in their organisation to handle integrity issues appropriately and effectively.
    • In the last 12 months, discrimination, harassment or bullying in the workplace has been experienced by 18% of people who identify as members of the rainbow community (vs 10% Total Sample) and observed by 33% (vs 20% Total Sample).
    • People who identify as members of rainbow communities are more likely to see barriers to career progression than other members of the workforce. The barriers that are felt most differently by this group include ‘poor salary/renumeration’, ‘bias’, and ‘poor leadership’
    • Feedback from survey respondents indicates that many organisations in the sector have no formal DE&I policy/strategy, or at least not one that is known to members of their board or staff. As a policy/strategy will guide and shape an organisation’s approach to DE&I, it is likely that further progress will be made if more organisations are encouraged and supported to develop their own DE&I policies/strategies and to share these with their teams.
  • Free to exist: Documenting participation data on LGBTIQA+ young people in sport and physical activity, opens in a new tab, Ryan Storr, Carleigh Yeomans, Kath Albury, et al., Swinburne University for VicHealth, (May 2024). The aim of this mixed-method research project was to collect participation data on LGBTIQA+ young people (aged 16-25) in sport and physical activity, whilst exploring the experiences, needs and engagement of LGBTIQA+ young people in sport and movement settings. In total, 20 young people aged 16-25 years participated in 5 focus groups, and 506 LGBTIQA+ young people participated in a quantitative survey. Quantitative and qualitative data paint a concerning picture of young LGBTIQA+ people’s participation in sport and physical activity, with lower rates of participation and engagement than the wider population and high rates of discrimination when they do engage. However, more promising, are the perspectives of young people who want to engage in sport and movement, and their motivation for sport and movement spaces to do more to be inclusive. Our data highlight the need for policy makers, sport managers, and physical activity providers to undertake targeted LGBTIQA+ diversity and inclusion work to ensure that LGBTIQA+ young people can access safe, inclusive, and equitable environments that are free from discrimination. Ongoing education, training, and development related to LGBTIQA+ inclusive practices are important to ensure sport environments are inclusive of LGBTIQA+ people. The consequences of not doing this work are far reaching and may have significant long-term impacts and consequences for LGBTIQA+ people, including trauma, and physical inactivity throughout their life course. Key findings included:
    • Representation and visibility: This theme related to the importance of LGBTIQA+ people being seen across sport and movement spaces. Young people spoke of the importance of role models, and increased visibility through pride games and campaigns. The associated secondary themes were importance of role models, need for greater representation, visibility of LGBTIQA+ people.
    • The need for a diverse workforce that reflects diversity in sexuality and gender. This then leads to young people seeing viable options and pathways into non-playing positions such as coaching and leadership. This is an under explored area with LGBTIQA+ sport scholarship, and our data suggested that young people notice the lack of LGBTIQA+ representation in coaching and administration in sport.
    • Data indicated that having out role models in sport, predominantly women, has a positive influence on young people and their relationship with sport. This is why young people value visibility of LGBTIQA+ people, which is our final secondary theme in this section.
    • Develop allyship programs and active ally related behaviours: In order to call out and reduce discrimination, LGBTIQA+ people need peers, coaches, and people alongside them to act as active allies. This might be through awareness campaigns, resources or infographics, and training on bystander intervention or responding to discriminatory events or incidents. This could be part of a broader program of allyship towards diverse groups, such as anti-racism and gender equity programs. In school-based settings, this could also link to gay straight alliances (GSAs), which have recently been established in some Australian schools.
  • PSI Practice Points: Data analysis from the PSI National Survey, Best practice for the inclusion of people of diverse genders and sexualities in Australian Sport, opens in a new tab, Pride in Sport, (2023). The annual Pride in Sport Equality Index (PSI) National Survey has been running for the past five years. Solid growth year on year has seen the survey go from 2 participating organisations/clubs and 14 responses in its first year to 27 and 1,043 responses in 2023. The PSI National Survey provides insight into the culture, beliefs, opinions, and differences between LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ respondents. All organisation who participated in the survey are working on LGBTQ inclusion. These results reflect the attitudes and knowledge of respondents who are in these organisations/clubs. These results likely differ from other surveys due to this positive focus on LGBTQ inclusion of these organisations/clubs.
    • There was a decrease in the number of respondents who: believe they understand some of the unique challenges that people of diverse sexuality and/or gender face in the workplace/sports clubs (2023: 80.6% v 2022: 86.6%); believe that there are more than 2 genders (2023: 59.1% v 2022: 61.9%); and a slight decrease in belief that a person of diverse gender would be welcome in the team and treated no differently to anyone else (2023: 86.4% v 2022: 87.3%).
    • 74.2% of respondents also agree that they believe training in this aspect of diversity & inclusion should be mandatory for anyone who manages or supervises other people. Respondents with direct reports agree to this slightly more than those who do not (75.3% v 73.4%).
    • Visible active allies within organisations/clubs have many impacts on organisational culture, particularly for people of diverse sexuality and/gender. 68.2% of respondents agreed that active allies have positively impacted their sense of inclusion.
  • Writing Themselves in, 4, opens in a new tab, Hill AO, Lyons A, Jones J, et al., Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, (2021). This is the fourth national study on the sexual health and well-being of same sex attracted young people in Australia. The series was expanded to include a survey targeting trans and gender diverse young people. With a total of 6,418 participants, 'Writing Themselves In 4' represents the largest ever survey of LGBTQA+ young people in Australia and one of the largest in the world. The sample of 'Writing Themselves In 4' is also diverse in terms of the gender and sexuality of participants. While over half were cisgender women, nearly a quarter were cisgender men, and a similar proportion were trans or non-binary.
    • Among participants who reported experiencing harassment or assault based on their sexuality or gender identity at sport in the past 12 months (n = 95), almost two-thirds (64.2%; n = 61) reported the perpetrator was a player/s from their team, one-half (51.6%; n = 49) player from another team, one fifth spectator/s (21.1%; n = 20), and 16.8% (n = 16) coach/es.
  • LGBT+ Inclusion in Football in Victoria, opens in a new tab, Proud2Play for Football Victoria and VicHealth, (March 2020). Previous research shows that sport is an environment where LGBT+ people typically do not feel safe to participate. Homophobia, transphobia and other discriminatory behaviours have been found to be commonplace across many sports. How LGBT+ inclusion (or these discriminatory behaviours) appear in the sport of football, particularly within community-level football, has previously been unknown. This report found that there is an attitude that LGBT+ inclusion is neither a problem nor a priority in football. There is a distinct lack of education and knowledge about LGBT+ inclusion. Most people think more should be done to support LGBT+ inclusion. Some key recommendations were:
    • There is a clear need to acknowledge that there is an issue of LGBT+ inclusion within football in Victoria.
    • The FV leadership team need to proactively pursue the recommendations from this research and develop a short- and long-term LGBT+ inclusion strategy to guide future work at FV in this space and incorporate this strategy into the FV Strategic Plan.
    • Embedding LGBT+ inclusion work into the job responsibility of a staff member, or multiple staff members. Maintaining a steering group for LGBT+ inclusion work in football in Victoria.
  • Evaluating LGBTI+ Inclusion within Sport and the Pride Cup Initiative, opens in a new tab, Ruth Jeanes, Karen Lambert, Justen O' Connor, et al., Monash University for VicHealth, (2020). In July 2019, VicHealth commissioned research to measure the impact of the Pride Cup program and resources. The evaluation suggests that clubs involved experience a range of benefits and positive impacts from their participation and the Pride Cup offers an accessible and structured way for them to engage and consider LGBTI+ inclusion. The evaluation contributes to an understanding of what works in LGBTI+ inclusion approaches within sport and why, in relation to changing long outdated attitudes and behaviours. Despite the problem of LGBTI+ discrimination and exclusion from sport being well studied, there is very little research focused on finding effective solutions.
    • The vast majority of organisers felt that hosting a Pride Cups created greater awareness of LGBTI+ inclusion and sent a strong message that homophobia would not be tolerated. All but three organisers moderately or very much agreed that significant people in the club had been educated about LGBTI+ inclusion.
    • An important function of the education sessions was highlighting the damaging impact of homophobic and exclusionary language, with all interviewees indicating that they, and their club members, had greater levels of awareness of the detrimental impact of language. Subsequently, volunteers suggested that they and other club members would be more willing to call out and challenge the use of such language within the club environment because of the training. One of the challenges was encouraging all club members to participate in education. Seven interviewees had not attended the education and whilst clubs generally reported good attendance (around 50 club members on average), the education was not thought to be having a whole club reach at some clubs, an issue reinforced by the organisers and members’ surveys.
    • Overall, participants from Pride Cup clubs were significantly less likely to use or witness the use of discriminatory language than participants from comparison clubs. This suggests the Pride Cup may potentially reduce discriminatory and exclusionary behaviours related to language use. Whilst the Pride Cup may have moderated exclusionary language it didn’t remove it, suggesting more work is needed.
  • Pride in Our Workforce: Exploring the role of the workforce in LGBT+ participation in physical activity and sport, opens in a new tab, Bournemouth University for Energise Me and Sport England, (2020). Researchers from Bournemouth University concluded that the physical activity and sport workforce (LGBT+ and non-LGBT+) has untapped potential to play a more prominent role in providing opportunities for LGBT+ communities. They can help by Increasing LGBT+ representation within the workforce (in paid and unpaid roles); Being approachable, inclusive and understanding; Creating environments that feel safe and welcoming for LGBT+ communities; Actively promoting activities for and/or to LGBT+ communities. Some key findings included:
    • Heterosexual people were more likely to occupy a workforce role. On average, they held significantly more roles in the workforce than other sexual identity groups
    • Non-binary individuals (those whose gender identity does not sit comfortably with ‘man’ or ‘woman’) were less likely to occupy a position in the workforce than participants that identified as men or women.
    • Transgender research participants were less likely to hold a workforce role. Transgender participants also occupied significantly fewer roles in the workforce when compared with non-transgender individuals.
    • LGBT+ workforce members displayed more varied responses in relation to comfort in expressing sexual or gender identity in their workforce role. Women who identified as lesbian were more likely to report feeling uncomfortable to express their sexual identity.
    • For LGBT+ respondents, it is less important that workforce members are qualified or experienced than it is that they are approachable, inclusive and understanding.
    • Participants discussed how disabilities or other characteristics coincided with their gender or sexual identity to create multiple effects, making physical activity and sport environments less inclusive or accessible. Understanding the person is a key agenda for future practice.
    • The need for training and knowledge emerged strongly in participant comments about how the workforce could be improved.
    • Challenging discrimination is a key way for the physical activity and sport workforce to increase perceptions of safety and inclusion for the LGBT+ community.
    • The workforce requires role models, from elite through to grassroots physical activity and sport. Participants wanted to see more openly LGBT+ leaders at elite and grassroots levels - be it high-profile athletes and pundits (e.g. Gareth Thomas or Claire Balding) or LGBT+ individuals in the physical activity and sport workforce.
  • Game to Play? Exploring the experiences and attitudes towards sport, exercise and physical activity amongst same sex attracted and gender diverse young people, opens in a new tab, Dr Ryan Storr, Kerry Robinson, Cristyn Davies, et al., Sexualities and Gender Research, Western Sydney University, (2020). Young SSAGD people in this research expressed a strong desire to participate in sport and physical exercise, and an awareness of the benefits, however most had experienced numerous forms of discrimination in sport and exercise, especially in PE at school. It is critical that steps are taken to address the violence and discrimination that SSAGD young people experience in sport and exercise environments, including tackling homophobia, biphobia, transphobia and heterosexism.
  • Inclusive Sport Practices, opens in a new tab, Murray Drummond, Sam Elliott, Claire Drummond, et al., Flinders University, Sport, Health, Activity, Performance and Exercise (SHAPE) Research Centre for Inclusive Sport South Australia (SA) and the Office for Recreation, Sport and Racing, (May 2019). This is the first South Australian report to identify barriers and enablers in sport for the LGBTIQ+ community. The findings and recommendations will help to advance a holistic approach for reducing homophobia and ‘homohysteria’ within sporting environments. Furthermore, the report provides contextually-informed evidence for creating, maintaining and enhancing inclusive sport environments for LGBTIQ+ participants and allies based on extensive research.
    • Of those within the LGBTIQ+ community, 79.7% had experienced (or witnessed) sexism in sport compared with 65.3% of the 20 heterosexual participants. The majority of both LGBTIQ+ and heterosexual participants had experienced (or witnessed) verbal homophobia in sport (63.7% and 59.2% respectively). Only 5% (n = 4) of LGBTIQ+ and 2% (n = 1) of heterosexual participants had experienced (or witnessed) physical homophobic assault in sport.
    • A key component to inclusive policy and practice within sporting clubs and organisations is education. Education from the “top down” was regarded as the most resourceful approach. Further, having a “champion of change” embedded within the club meant there is a greater chance of systemic cultural change.
    • Endorsement and action through policy making is imperative at the President / board / committee level. They must provide a clear message with respect to what the club stands for.
    • It is imperative that all coaches are educated and aware of the needs of LGBTIQ+ individuals who may enter the club and seek to participate.
  • Exploring Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Inclusion in Australian Cricket, opens in a new tab, Ryan Storr, Grant O’Sullivan, Caroline Symons, et al., Victoria University prepared for Cricket Australia and Cricket Victoria, (August 2017). Cricket Australia and Cricket Victoria commissioned the Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL) at Victoria University to examine the current climate, attitudes and initiatives towards LGBT inclusion within Australian cricket. In order to address these aims, the authors conducted a mixed methods study combining an online survey and in-depth interviews. A total of 338 respondents completed the survey, comprising cricket employees, players, coaches, administrators and volunteers. In addition, 17 in-depth interviews were conducted with key informants from the Victorian and Australian cricket communities. The findings demonstrate both challenges and opportunities with regard to LGBT inclusion in Australian cricket. The survey data show the prevalence of homophobia, biphobia and transphobia, and how homophobia also impacts heterosexual participants.
    • Over 90 percent of both LGBT and non-LGBT respondents think LGBT people are accepted to some degree in various roles in cricket. Non-LGBT respondents reported staff as the most completely accepted role, while LGBT respondents selected players. The role least selected as completely accepted was the coach by both LGBT and non-LGBT respondents.
    • Respondents believe LGBT people are more completely accepted as volunteers and players and less so in leadership or coaching roles in cricket clubs.
    • Based on the research findings, this report proposes the following recommendations: Developing an LGTB inclusion policy; Awareness and capability training; Establishing an LGBT working group; Considering LGBT inclusive workplace practices; Developing a public relations and communication strategy for LGBT inclusion; Recruiting LGBT allies; Supporting athletes; Addressing homophobia; Initiating participation programs for LGBT inclusion; Developing an LGBT supporters' group.
  • Out on the Fields: The first international study on homophobia in sport, opens in a new tab, Denison E, Moseley L and Kitchen A, Repucom, (10 May 2015). This study provides insight into the experiences of LGB athletes, but it also looks at the experiences of LGB people generally, their experiences as participants and as spectators. The study takes a particular focus on issues of sexuality, rather than gender, which is why the report uses the term LGB, rather than the now standard LGBTI. The study goes beyond capturing the experiences and views of LGB people, as it also includes the experiences and perspectives of nearly 2500 heterosexual participants who make up about 25% of the sample. By including people with a wide range of sexualities, this study provides an opportunity to compare attitudes between these sexualities. The survey included six main countries (USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom and Ireland) and a collective sample from several other countries. The Australian portion of the survey included 3006 participants. Key findings include:
    • 81% of gay men and 74% of lesbian women under the age of 22 had reported concealing, or only partially revealing, their sexual identity while playing sport. Approximately half of gays and a third of lesbians said they hid their sexuality because they were worried about being rejected by teammates; 31% of gays and 15% of lesbians were also worried about discrimination from coaches and officials.
  • Summary for Australia on Homophobia in Sport, opens in a new tab, Out on the Fields, (2015). Out on the Fields is the first international study and largest conducted on homophobia in sport. Nearly 9500 people took part including 3006 lesbian, gay, bisexual and straight Australians. Australia ranked in the middle on many measures, though quite poorly on some key measures such as whether gay athletes feel they are welcome in sport and feel safe to be open about their sexuality. Australia had the highest number of gay men (13%) who felt they were “not accepted at all” in sporting culture which was nearly three times as high as Canada (5%). Australia also had the second highest number (87%) of young gay athletes who remain in the closet (after New Zealand) and the highest number of gay youth who stay in the closet because of a fear of bullying (55%) and discrimination from coaches and officials (37%). Spectator stands were a major concern to Australians, with nearly half of all participants saying this is where homophobia in sport is most likely to occur. This was the second highest number after the UK (49%). The vast majority of Australian (75%) participants also felt LGB people are not very safe as spectators at sporting events, though they were less likely to believe this than those in the UK (85%).
  • “The Equal Play Study”: The Impact of Homophobic Bullying during Sport and Physical Education Participation on Same-Sex Attracted and Gender-Diverse Young Australians’ Depression and Anxiety Levels, opens in a new tab, Caroline Symons, Grant O’Sullivan, Erika Borkoles, et al., Victoria University for the beyondblue Victorian Centre of Excellence, (March 2014). Same-sex attracted and gender diverse (SSAGD) youth who may or may not be open about their sexuality or gender identity, have reported significantly higher mental health and wellbeing concerns than heterosexual youth. Despite many SSAGD youth thriving in sport and physical education (PE) settings, homophobia and transphobia communicates to them that ‘they are not welcome here, which can prevent them from enjoying the many physical, mental and social health benefits of participation and to maintain lifelong participation. PE class was a particular concern for SSAGD youth, where verbal and physical abuse was reported more often than in other sport settings. Policy and curriculum writers, PE teachers and those who train PE teachers are well placed to provide a more inclusive educational environment for SSAGD youth. Casual homophobic language, such as ‘that’s so gay’ where the intention of the word ‘gay’ is not specifically a gay slur, was frequently reported in these settings, especially in PE. Many young SSAGD people found it distressing. Challenging such homophobic language is important for improving the sport and PE experiences of SSAGD youth and helps them to be accepted by their peers. The gendered nature of sport and PE provides challenges for gender diverse young people, and more focus should be placed on understanding their needs and on ways to encourage safer and more welcoming participation for this group

  • Exploring identity work of LGBT+ volunteers in sport through personas: the advocate, the community-minded and the sportsperson, opens in a new tab, Saara Lahti, Linda Allin, Lindsay Findlay-King, European Sport Management Quarterly, (27 October 2024). Sport volunteering can be a valued and meaningful way to engage in sport beyond participation, but sport volunteers lack diversity in the UK. Specifically, there has been a lack of insight into experiences and identities of LGBT+ volunteers in sport. Therefore, this research explores how LGBT+ volunteers construct, negotiate and manage their identities over time and through the use of personas. Using identity work as a theoretical lens and from a social constructionist perspective, this study employs topical life history interviews of 16 sexually diverse sport volunteers to explore identity work strategies adopted by participants to navigate their volunteer experiences. Using constructivist grounded theory analysis, the study identifies three personas (1) advocate, (2) community-minded and (3) sportsperson – through which identity processes are expressed, illustrating the shifts in these personas as participants navigate their volunteer experiences. By acknowledging the fluidity of identity processes and the influence of socio-political contexts, sport organisations can create more inclusive environments that accommodate the varying needs of LGBT+ volunteers.
  • "I Get Treated Poorly in Regular School-Why Add To It?": Transgender Girls' Experiences Choosing to Play or Not Play Sports, opens in a new tab, DeChants, JP, Green, AE, Price MN, et al., Transgender Health, Volume 9(1), pp.61-67, (2024). Among respondents' answers about why they participate in sports, six codes were identified: physical health benefits, mental health benefits, fun, social connections, family expectations, and gender affirmation. Among respondents' answers about why they do not participate in sports, eight codes were identified: not interested in sports, gendered teams or spaces, not athletic, physical or mental health limitations, social discomfort around peer athletes, worsened gender dysphoria, bullying or harassment, and lack of resources or access. These codes were not mutually exclusive and many responses were tagged with multiple codes. This study highlights the need for inclusive sports environments for transgender athletes. Providing LGBTQ cultural competence training for coaches, administrators, and parents may decrease barriers and increase comfort for transgender athletes, allowing them to benefit from the skills and education that sports provide.
  • NCAA coaches’ perceptions of the inclusion of transgender athletes: a qualitative analysis, opens in a new tab, Macey Arnold, Kasey Chambers, Trent Petrie, Sport, Education and Society, Volume 29(5), pp.576-592, (2024). The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) established policies for the inclusion of transgender athletes to compete in collegiate sport that align with their gender identity. Despite this access, the extent to which collegiate sport environments are welcoming, inclusive and supportive of transgender athletes is unclear. Understanding coaches’ perceptions and attitudes is particularly salient given the critical, and often personal, nature of coach–athlete relationships and the impact coaches have on sport environments. The present study aims investigate coaches’ perceptions to be able to inform policy and education for promoting inclusive, safe environments for transgender athletes. We asked NCAA coaches (N = 1358) to describe the reasoning for their beliefs regarding the inclusion of transgender athletes in collegiate sports. Through reflexive thematic analysis, we determined coaches’ reasoning for their perceptions, within the context of five higher-order themes: (a) It’s not right: Transgender identities as invalid, (b) A need to protect (cis) women’s sports, (c) Transgender rights are human rights, (d) Sport’s role in society and coaches’ role in sport and (e) I am not sure what I believe. Analyses illuminate avenues for transgender athlete inclusion training for coaches.
  • ‘Close, but not always close enough to come out to': a large-scale online qualitative study of interpersonal relationships experienced by LGBTQ + individuals in sport, opens in a new tab, Shannon Herrick, Alexandra Moisan, Lindsay Duncan, Sport, Education and Society, (16 February 2023). Despite concerted efforts, LGBTQ + inclusivity is not fostered across all sporting contexts. Interpersonal relationships with teammates and coaches are particularly significant when it comes to cultivating positive and inclusive LGBTQ + experiences within sport. Using online qualitative data collected from 741 LGBTQ + adults, this study examined how relationships with coaches, teammates and sport-related staff impacted sport experiences and participation. Participant responses were independently coded using reflexive thematic analysis. Data were used to develop a new visual model to understand different types of relationships LGBTQ + individuals experience in sport and how this impacted their sport experiences. Exclusive sport relationships were characterised by experiences of discrimination and were found to greatly influence how participants viewed sport and physical activity contexts as adults. Inert or neutral sport relationships were maintained through protective self-distancing techniques. Inclusive relationships with coaches and teammates were primarily based on acceptance and associated with viewing physical activity positively. Identity-concealment strategies and athletic ability were identified as factors that impacted LGBTQ + adults’ relationships within sport. Our overall findings demonstrate how discrimination in the form of overt or subtle sexual and gender prejudice can thwart feelings of relatedness among LGBTQ + athletes.
  • Effectiveness of an educational intervention targeting homophobic language use by young male athletes: a cluster randomised controlled trial, opens in a new tab, Denison E, Faulkner N, O’Brien KS, et al., British Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 57(), pp.515-520, (2023). Homophobic language is common in male sport and associated with negative physical and mental health outcomes for all sport participants, but particularly for gay or bisexual youth populations. Evidence-based interventions are needed to reduce such language and mitigate harm. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a short social-cognitive educational intervention delivered by professional rugby union players in youth sport.In a two-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial, 13 Australian youth rugby teams from 9 clubs (N=167, ages 16–20, mean 17.9) were randomised into intervention or control groups. Professional rugby players delivered the intervention in-person. Frequency of homophobic language use was measured 2 weeks before and 2 weeks after the intervention. Hypothesised factors underpinning homophobic language were also measured, including descriptive (other people use), prescriptive and proscriptive injunctive norms (approval/disapproval by others), and attitudes towards the acceptability of homophobic language. At baseline, 49.1% of participants self-reported using homophobic language in the past 2 weeks and 72.7% reported teammates using homophobic language. Significant relationships were found between this behaviour and the hypothesised factors targeted by the intervention. However, generalised estimating equations found the intervention did not significantly reduce homophobic language, or alter the associated norms and attitudes, relative to controls. Use of professional rugby athletes to deliver education on homophobic language was not effective. Other approaches to reduce homophobic language (and other forms of discrimination) such as peer-to-peer education, and enforcement of policies prohibiting specific language by coaches, should be explored.
  • “It Was My Story to Tell and I Wasn’t Ready to Tell It”: Stigma Management Amongst LGBTQ+ Sport Officials, opens in a new tab, Anna Baeth, Jacob Tingle, Brittany Jacobs, et al., Journal of Sport and Social Issues, Volume 47(3), pp.228-255, (2023). The erasure of marginalized people, especially LGBTQ+ people, is commonplace in sport. As sport has become more commercialized, even at grassroots and youth levels), one group that has become even further marginalized and dehumanized are sports officials. Understanding the intersection of marginalized identities is important; as such, this study examined how homophobia and transphobia interplay with the sports officiating profession. Semistructured interviews with 16 self-identified LGBTQ+ referees revealed a series of organizational and social factors that led officials to either pass as non-LGBTQ+ or to come out as LGBTQ+, leading to the development of the LGBTQ+ Referee Identity Management Process Model. Implications for better supporting LGBTQ+ officials to promote higher levels of retention and career satisfaction are presented.
  • ‘Game to play?’: barriers and facilitators to sexuality and gender diverse young people's participation in sport and physical activity, opens in a new tab, R. Storr, L. Nicholas, K. Robinson, et al., Sport, Education and Society, Volume 27(5), pp.604-617, (2022). This study reports on 13 semi-structured interviews with young SAGD people aged 18–24 in Australia that explore their attitudes to and experiences of sport and physical activity. We found that SAGD young people are ‘game to play’: they hold strong desires to participate in sport and physical activity, and articulated how sport could be more inclusive. Using Bourdieu's concept of ‘capital’, we outline how young SAGD people identify sport as a ‘field’ that requires and fosters various types of capital. We explore barriers they identified that prevent the accumulation of physical and social capital associated with sport participation and physical activity, and their insights for how this may be fostered. The ‘field’ of sport presents as an exclusionary environment, which allows for both explicit bullying and more subtle discriminatory practices. Passive assimilation approaches are not enough to provoke substantial change and active intervention is required to decentre the heteronormativity underpinning these spaces, which has implications for policy and practice to advance the inclusion of SAGD young people in sporting environments.
  • Specific Detriment: Barriers and Opportunities for Non-Binary Inclusive Sports in Scotland, opens in a new tab, Sonja Erikainen, Ben Vincent, Al Hopkins, Journal of Sport and Social Issues, Volume 46(1), pp.75-102, (2022). While non-binary gender identities have become increasingly visible in recent years, little research currently exists on the experiences that non-binary people have in sport, where most opportunities to participate are limited to two, mutually exclusive female and male categories. This article provides a starting point for addressing this gap, by reporting findings from a participatory scoping study that explored the barriers that non-binary people face in accessing sporting spaces, communities, and competitions. This study also identified strategies through which these barriers could be overcome, and non-binary inclusion facilitated. Taken together, these strategies suggest that genuine inclusion entails not only new ways of thinking about how gender operates in sport but also alternative ways of thinking about the meaning and value of sport itself.
  • Support for LGBT diversity and inclusion in sport: a mixed methods study of Australian cricket, opens in a new tab, Ryan Storr, Grant O’Sullivan, Ramón Spaaij, et al., Sport Management Review, Volume 25(5), pp.723-747, (2022). his paper explores the extent and nature of support for LGBT diversity in sport, with an empirical focus on cricket in Australia. Using a mixed method research design, the authors combine an online survey (n = 337) and semi-structured interviews (n = 17) across various levels of competition and administration. Drawing on Avery’s theory of support for diversity, the findings demonstrate a perceived lack of institutional support through endorsement and activism for LGBT diversity but noticeable support from the grassroots cricket community. The survey data show a perceived need for increased efforts to include LGBT communities in cricket. Stakeholder interviews demonstrate a lack of understanding and awareness of LGBT diversity amongst administration at both the community and leadership levels. We contend that if cricket in Australia is to truly be a “sport for all”, and policy imperatives around diversity and inclusion are to be achieved, clear and consistent institutional support showing both commitment and action towards LGBT diversity must be demonstrated.
  • Are we there yet? (Illusions of) Inclusion in sport for LGBT+ communities in Australia, opens in a new tab, Ryan Storr, Ruth Jeanes, Tony Rossi, et al., International Review for the Sociology of Sport, Volume 57(1), (June 2021). This paper reports findings from five recent studies related to gender and sexuality in Australian sport. It offers a challenge to widespread claims that exclusionary practices such as homo/bi/transphobia have been reduced or eliminated within sport settings. We suggest there remains much to be done towards ‘inclusion’, and that the concept itself is perhaps an illusion. Drawing on ‘diversity work’ theory we suggest inclusion is yet to be fully realised in sport-based research circles, and we argue that claims about the advanced progress in inclusion for LGBT+ people are problematic. Structures of language, institutional organisation and misaligned practices act as blocks to inclusion and fuel discrimination. We conclude by offering suggestions about where these can be addressed in sport and in research.
  • It Is Not a Checking Off of Boxes: Creating LGBTQ Inclusive Spaces and Policies in Community Sport, opens in a new tab, Vikki Krane, Tanya Prewitt-White, Meredith A. Whitley, in 'Community Sport Coaching: Policies and Practice, opens in a new tab', Ben Ives, Paul Potrac, Laura Gale, Lee Nelson (eds.), Routledge, (2021). Community sport organisations can be a model of inclusion and outreach for their lesbian, gay male, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) members. Yet, gender and sexually diverse athletes often are invisible, excluded, or overlooked in community sport programmes. This chapter reflects upon the current state of community sport for LGBTQ participants and explores how to become more inclusive. Common non-discrimination and inclusive policies are shared along with suggestions for coach education and practices that can better prepare coaches to address LGBTQ inclusion and create an LGBTQ affirming environment. Lastly, we share a narrative of two coaches’ perspectives revealing inclusion strategies and wisdom from individuals embracing what it means to be an LGBTQ inclusive coach and leader. Applying an intersectional approach to LGBTQ inclusion, this chapter advocates proactive non-discrimination and inclusive policies, intentional education, and transformative leaders and coaches. This multipronged foundation will cultivate a healthy and compassionate environment where LGBTQ athletes can feel embraced, included, and affirmed.
  • A Case Study Exploring the Experiences of a Transgender Athlete in Synchronized Skating, a Subdiscipline of Figure Skating, opens in a new tab, Shannon Herrick, Meredith Rocchi, A. Lauren Couture, Journal of Sport and Social Issues, Volume 44(5), pp.421-449, (October 2020). The inclusion of transgender athletes in sport challenges a number of long-standing cis-heteronormative beliefs within athletics at all levels of competition. There are limited studies examining the integration and experiences of transgender athletes within amateur sport. The following case study follows the experiences of a transgender synchronized figure skater, Mason, who was able to continue competing throughout his transition process. We conducted eight semi-structured one-on-one interviews with Mason, his teammates, his team manager, and his past and present coaches. All interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subject to thematic analysis which resulted in four overarching themes: (a) building inclusivity: “promote a safe space,” (b) acknowledging stress, (c) disclosure: “I didn’t want to talk about my past,” and (d) celebration. Results are interpreted as recommendations for coaches on how to adopt inclusive practices to better support transgender athletes.
  • LGBT Diversity and Inclusion, Community Characteristics, and Success, opens in a new tab, George Cunningham, Calvin Nite, Journal of Sport Management, Volume 34(6), pp.533-541, (May 2020). Drawing from concepts in institutional theory, the purpose of this study was to examine how community measures intersect with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender inclusiveness to predict organizational success. The authors collected publicly available data about National Collegiate Athletic Association departments (N = 65) and their communities. Moderated regression analyses demonstrated significant interactive effects, such that performance was highest when the department followed an inclusive strategy and (a) the lesbian, gay, and bisexual population density was high and (b) the state-level implicit bias toward sexual minorities was low. Importantly, there were no negative effects in following an inclusive strategy, even when institutional logics did not prescribe such an approach. The models explained 60–62% of the variance in performance. The authors discuss theoretical and practical implications.
  • The Case for LGBT Diversity and Inclusion in Sport Business, opens in a new tab, George Cunningham, Umer Hussain, Sport and Entertainment Review, (January 2020). Sport is a paradox when it comes to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals. On the one hand, prejudice and discrimination limit the access and opportunities for LGBT athletes, coaches, and administrators. On the other hand, an increasing number of teams are reaching out to the LGBT community via various mechanisms. Further, sexual orientation diversity and inclusion is associated with improved experiences for athletes and coaches, irrespective of their sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, as well as performance gains for teams and sport organizations. The purposes of this review article are to (a) overview the influence of sexual orientation diversity and inclusion in sport, and (b) offer sport and entertainment managers actions to make their workplaces diverse and inclusive. The authors first identify why the benefits of LGBT diversity and inclusion exist and then highlight how sport organizations can create and sustain a diverse and inclusive environment. The authors’ research shows that multilevel efforts are needed, with a focus on individual interactions, leader behaviors, organizational policies, and the interaction with the broader environment in which the sport organization is situated. Collectively, the authors present a case for LGBT diversity and inclusion, showing sport and entertainment managers (a) the benefits of such practices, and (b) steps to create and sustain inclusiveness in their work environments.
  • Implementation of Promising Practices for LGBTQ Inclusion: A Multilevel Process, opens in a new tab, Daniel Theriault, Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, Volume 35(3), (2017). Recreation professionals have moral, fiscal, and legal incentives to ensure that individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) have access to safe, beneficial services that respond to their unique needs. In this overview of education, social work, diversity management and leisure studies literatures, the author presents potential constraints and supports that may arise during the implementation of promising practices for LGBTQ inclusion. Those factors are organized according to Ferdman’s (2014) multilevel inclusion framework. At the individual level, participants’ perceptions of inclusion are shaped by the ways their various identities are experienced in recreation contexts. Practitioners who focus solely on LGBTQ identities may miss opportunities to support participants through significant challenges such as racism or ableism. At the interpersonal level, heterosexuals are often motivated by past experiences with discrimination to advocate with LGBTQ youth. However, some heterosexual employees may require training to effectively advocate with LGBTQ youth. At the group level, recreation professionals should expect both resistance to and support for inclusion initiatives. Understanding resistance and points of support within and outside of the organization may prepare practitioners for roadblocks and assist them in leveraging points of support. At the leadership level, recreation administrators exert unique influence on inclusion initiatives by modeling desired behaviors and establishing organizational priorities. Administrators who lack experience or comfort with LGBTQ populations may unintentionally stall inclusion efforts. At the organizational level, administrators must be cognizant of both who an organization has historically served and how organizational culture can support or undermine inclusion programs. At the societal level, cultural norms about LGBTQ identities influence who is authorized to speak and how LGBTQ participants should be treated. Recreation practitioners who intentionally disrupt these norms by implementing promising practices may frame their program as a site for social justice. Practitioners who pursue inclusion in light of the above issues may be able to enhance the intended outcomes of promising practices and avoid unintended consequences.
  • Transgender and gender nonconforming athletes: Creating safe spaces for all, opens in a new tab, Morris J and Van Raalte J, Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, (2 June 2016). Transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) athletes face a number of challenges in a sport setting. This article provides information on how coaches can create more welcoming environments by using appropriate language, educating team members, and offering social support for TGNC athletes.
  • Educating Coaches on Their Role in the Prevention of Homophobic Bullying in Adolescent Sport, opens in a new tab, Lana Jade McCloughan, Emma Louise Mattey, Stephanie J. Hanrahan, International Sport Coaching Journal, Volume 2(3), pp.317-329, (2015). The purpose of this paper is to critically discuss current views on coaches’ roles in homophobic bullying prevention in adolescent sport and provide an example of a program designed to upskill coaches in this important area. A review of the prevalence of homophobic bullying in sport is provided. The importance of the role of the coach in addressing bullying in adolescent sport is then discussed. Coach education and learning theory are examined and an example of a coach education workshop on homophobic bullying prevention is detailed. A summary of the evaluation completed by the coach participants of the education workshop is provided, with potential modifications to the workshop noted. The need for intervention is linked back to the literature in the conclusion.
  • Creating and Sustaining Workplace Cultures Supportive of LGBT Employees in College Athletics, opens in a new tab, George Cunningham, Journal of Sport Management, Volume 29(4), pp.426-442, (2014). The purpose of this study was to understand (a) how participants conceptualized lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) inclusiveness in their athletic departments, (b) the antecedents of such workplace environments, and (c) the outcomes associated with inclusion. To do so, the author conducted a collective case study of two college athletic departments located in the U.S. Northeast. Participants described the athletic departments as characterized by community and cohesion, respect and inclusion, and success oriented. Various antecedents contributed to these workplace environments, including those at the individual level, leader behaviors, inclusive organizational policies, and macro-level influences. Finally, while some negative outcomes were identified, LGBT inclusion was predominantly associated with a host of positive outcomes for the employees, athletes, and organizations as a whole.
  • Varying degrees of support: Understanding parents’ positive attitudes toward LGBT coaches, opens in a new tab, Cunningham G and Melton E, Journal of Sport Management, Volume 28(4), pp.387-398, (2014). This study examined parents’ supportive attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) coaches, as well as the sources of that support. Interviews were conducted with 10 parents who lived in the southwest United States. Analysis of the data revealed three different types of support: indifference, qualified support, and unequivocal support. In each of these examples, participants express support for LGBT coaches, but they did so in ways that were qualified and served to perpetuate underlying stereotypes about sexual minorities, including those that sexual minorities have ulterior motives, promote their sexual orientation to others, and are sexual predators. These stereotypes persist even though most heterosexual American adults acknowledge that the claims are baseless. It is also interesting that such conditional statements are seldom included when discussing heterosexual coaches or coaches in general (assumed to be heterosexual). By expressing support for LGBT coaches the parents absolve themselves of expressing prejudicial attitudes. That is, they communicate support for sexual minorities and therefore cast themselves as egalitarian, accepting individuals. By offering qualified support, the parents in this study discriminate in very subtle ways that can otherwise be explained away. Their conditional statements are largely institutionalised as a form of heterosexism and thus part of the societal norm.
  • Gendered homophobia in sport and coaching: Understanding the everyday experiences of lesbian coaches, opens in a new tab, Norman L, International Review for the Sociology of Sport, Volume 47(6), pp.705-723, (2012). This article discusses a theory of everyday gendered homophobia as a way of understanding lesbian coaches’ experiences in their profession. Ten professional women coaches who identified themselves as lesbian, from both individual and team sports within the UK, were interviewed.

  • Interactive scenario: Homophobia and Sexuality Discrimination, opens in a new tab, Play by the Rules, (accessed 4 February 2025). This short scenario explores how a club responds to concerns that one of their coaches is gay. The scenario explores issues that can arise when dealing with questions relating to homosexuality in sport. As you read through the material think about what you would do in this situation.
  • Pride in Our Workforce resource, opens in a new tab, Bournemouth University for Energise Me and Sport England, (2021). This resource is designed to support you and your team (workforce) to become more inclusive. It highlights potential barriers to LGBT+ communities enjoying physical activity and offers recommendations to help you make positive changes. Our research reveals that participants from LGBT+ communities look for signs that organisations are inclusive, such as displaying a rainbow flag. Displaying a sign such as this comes with a responsibility to actually ‘be inclusive’. Throughout this resource we aim to challenge you on this - not to highlight where you are going wrong, but to allow you as individual organisations to identify gaps in knowledge or actions and learn how to improve. You will probably find that any changes made will not only benefit members from LGBT+ communities but everyone else as well.
  • OUTSPORT Toolkit: Supporting sport educators in creating and maintaining an inclusive sport community based on diversity of gender identities and sexual orientations, opens in a new tab, Laszlo Foldi, Outsport project, (2019). This training toolkit is designed to assist sport operators (including educators and managers) in innovatively preventing and tackling anti-LGBTI hate crime and discrimination and their causes, by fostering capacity building and education. The Toolkit consists of 5 thematic sections, including a chapter presenting the main findings of the European research into the experiences of LGBTI people in sport; a chapter on specific empowering pedagogic approach with high potentials; a collection of concrete educational tools that support coaches and teachers in the creation of SOGI inclusive sport communities; and a collection of existing examples of non-discriminative organisational best practices.
  • Leading the Way: Working with LGBT Athletes and Coaches, opens in a new tab (2nd ed.), Jennifer Birch-Jones, Canadian Women and Sport, (2017). A comprehensive resource designed for coaches, and is based on the lived experiences of Canadian athletes and coaches. The resource highlights current issues in Canadian sport, from playground to podium, and aims to make sport a more welcoming place for those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans (transgender), two-spirited, queer or questioning (LGBTQ). Leading the Way provides information to help coaches understand LBGTQphobia and the negative impact it has on everyone in their sport. It suggests best practices for creating a sport environment that is safe and respectful for all.

Access to resources Where possible, direct links to full-text and online resources are provided. However, where links are not available, you may be able to access documents directly by searching our licenced full-text databases (note: user access restrictions apply). Alternatively, you can ask your institutional, university, or local library for assistance—or purchase documents directly from the publisher. You may also find the information you’re seeking by searching Google Scholar, opens in a new tab.

Working together for Australian sport

C4S-Footer-Sport Integrity Australia logo
C4S-Footer-Sport Integrity Australia logo
C4S-Footer-Australian Sports Foundation logo
C4S-Footer-Australian Sports Foundation logo
C4S-Footer-Australian Olympic Committee
C4S-Footer-Australian Olympic Committee
C4S-Footer-Paralympics Australia logo
C4S-Footer-Paralympics Australia logo
C4S-Footer-Commonwealth Games Australia logo
C4S-Footer-Commonwealth Games Australia logo
C4S-Footer-SAHOF
C4S-Footer-SAHOF
C4S-Footer-Invictus Australia logo
C4S-Footer-Invictus Australia logo
C4S-Footer-PLA
C4S-Footer-PLA
C4S-Footer-ACT Gov
C4S-Footer-ACT Gov
C4S-Footer-NSW Gov
C4S-Footer-NSW Gov
C4S-Footer-NT Gov
C4S-Footer-NT Gov
C4S-Footer-QLD Gov
C4S-Footer-QLD Gov
C4S-Footer-SA Gov
C4S-Footer-SA Gov
C4S-Footer-Tas Gov
C4S-Footer-Tas Gov
C4S-Footer-Vic Gov
C4S-Footer-Vic Gov
C4S-Footer-WA Gov
C4S-Footer-WA Gov
C4S-Footer-ACTAS
C4S-Footer-ACTAS
C4S-Footer-NSWIS
C4S-Footer-NSWIS
C4S-Footer-NT
C4S-Footer-NT
C4S-Footer-QAS
C4S-Footer-QAS
C4S-Footer-SASI
C4S-Footer-SASI
C4S-Footer-TIS
C4S-Footer-TIS
C4S-Footer-VIS
C4S-Footer-VIS
C4S-Footer-WAIS
C4S-Footer-WAIS
First Nations Flags, the Aboriginal flag and the Torres Strait Islander flag.
The Clearinghouse for Sport pay our respects to the Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and acknowledge the valuable contribution Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people make to Australian society and sport.