AboutContact UsRegister

Cost (direct financial and time)

The 'cost' of sport can include time, investment, travel, opportunity and service.

A 2023 survey by the Australian Sports Commission of 6,600 individuals found that sport being ‘too expensive to play/buy gear’ was the most identified barrier. 1

'Cost' is consistently identified in the literature as a barrier to sport and physical activity participation, although financial cost is not always the primary consideration. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

The 'cost' of sport can include:

  • Time – commitment to organised sports participation is often seen as a 'cost' and therefore, becomes a potential barrier. This includes the time commitment of the player or volunteer and – in the case of a child – the time commitment of parents/family. 3, 7, 23
  • Financial investment – registration fees, uniforms, equipment, game fees, etc. Specific financial costs vary by sport, age of participant, and location. 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
  • Travel - additional costs associated with transportation (petrol, time, public transport fees). 3, 9, 10, 12, 15
  • Opportunity – the cost of other activities that participants could be doing instead (e.g. study, unstructured time with friends or family, working). 3, 6, 12, 16, 17
  • Service – volunteering within the sports club system, especially among parents, can also be perceived as a social obligation, where individuals feel compelled to volunteer time, over-and-above the monetary outlay for sport. 6, 8

Emerging trends suggest that these various 'cost' factors, and cost-of-living increases, have made alternative forms of physical activity and recreation in less structured environments (compared to clubs) more attractive. 4, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20

AusPlay

There is limited detailed data available on the direct financial costs of sport participation, especially how costs vary between different sports/activities or geographical location (e.g. states, territories, regional, metropolitan). 2, 4

The Australian Sports Commission's AusPlay survey collects information on the amounts individuals and parents report paying for themselves or their children to participate in sport and physical activities.

In 2024: 22

  • 52% of Australians aged 15 years and over, who participated in sport or physical activity at least once in the previous 12 months, paid to participate. The average (mean) cost per year was $1478. Average total spending was highest for people aged 35-44 years ($2203). 
  • 74% of participating children (0-14 years) paid to play organised sport and physical activities outside of school hours at least once in the previous 12 months. The average (mean) amount paid to participate was $1065. Parents appear to spend more on girls' activities ($1174) than boys’ ($964). 

Impact on different population groups

Australian and international research have identified how various costs can impact different groups within the population. 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 24

There may also be additional intersectional factors that can make cost more or less of a barrier to participation (e.g. the intersection of living in a rural or regional area and being in a higher or lower income household). 2, 12, 13, 24, 25, 26

Clearinghouse for Sport topics with additional information on cost as a factor influencing participation include:

  • Australia's First Nations Peoples and Sport. Cost, including time (to participate, but also as competing commitments to family, community, or work), transportation, fees, uniforms, equipment, etc. can all impact on the participation of First Nations individuals.
  • Socio-economic Status and Sport. Socio-economic status is often seen as part of an intersectional understanding of how multiple factors can impact on an individual’s experience of discrimination or privilege in different aspects of their lives, including sport and physical activity participation.
  • Sport and persons with disability. For participants with disability there are often additional costs on top of those that all participants might have (e.g. registration fees, uniforms, etc.). For example, transportation, specialised equipment, additional entrance fees if they need someone to provide assistance can all be additional costs that need to be covered by individuals, families, or organisations who want to encourage participation.
  • Volunteers in Sport. Two of the most frequently identified barriers to volunteering are costs (out-of-pocket expenses, travel, meals, training, specialist software/equipment) and time.
  • Women in Sport. The cost of childcare, transport, specific clothing/equipment and the expense of training and competitions are barriers that have been identified for women and girls.
  • Cost of Sports Injuries. The benefits of sport and physical activity are well established, but the risk of injury associated with participation are also real and can have significant personal and societal costs.

Mitigating financial costs

Recognising that financial cost is often a barrier several Australian state and territory governments currently offer 'sport vouchers' to help off-set the costs of children participating in sport. Evidence from program evaluations and surveys of parents/guardians suggest these programs are generally useful and well received. 9, 27, 28, 33, 34

More information is available in the Clearinghouse for Sport Grants and Funding for Sport and Recreation topic.

Some other suggestions for mitigating financial costs include:

  • Repurposing/recycling good condition uniforms and equipment. 29, 35
  • Providing financial discounts to individuals or families in return for volunteer time. 29, 35
  • Offering long-term, free, or low-cost programs especially through schools or on school grounds. 13, 30, 32
  • Subsidising or providing transport. 14, 30, 31
  • Having different pricing strategies, payment plans, or options to subsidise fees for individuals or families. 35

Resources and reading

  • No cash, no play? Have cost-of-living pressures impacted sports participation in Australia?, opens in a new tab Vaughan Cruickshank, Brendon Hyndman, Tom Hartley, The Conversation, (10 April 2024). Many Australians have in recent years been impacted by the cost-of-living crisis, but what about sport participation? While many Australians, and their children, enjoy participating in sports, it can be a costly passion, hitting the hip pocket with costs such as equipment, registration, coaching and accident insurance.
  • Cost-of-living pressures impacting sports clubs, families around Australia, opens in a new tab, Aaron Kelly, ABC Capricornia, (16 February 2024). With the cost-of-living crisis placing a strain on families, community sporting clubs are on the brink of collapse, a leading sports organisation has revealed. Australian Sports Foundation chief executive officer Patrick Walker says challenging economic conditions are "a massive issue".
  • How rising cost of living is impacting sport and physical activity, opens in a new tab, Sport England, (11 January 2024). We’ve published a new report that examines how the rising cost of living is impacting the sport and physical activity sector that is intended to help activity providers understand the impact cost of living is having on their participants. Rising living costs in England have been caused by various factors such as the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, the war in Ukraine, supply chain problems and higher interest rates, as well as inflation and low wage growth. The report found:
    • The increased cost of living has led to people changing their behaviours in relation to activity, and these changes are unlikely to be reversed until household finances improve.
    • People from the most deprived areas and from lower socioeconomic backgrounds are more likely to say their levels of physical activity have been negatively affected by cost-of-living increases.
    • Club activities are nearing pre-Covid levels, but cost pressures, especially from rising energy prices, affect club finances which in turn, is making access less affordable for some.
    • Some facility providers are reporting concerns regarding increases in utility costs and are responding by reducing sessions and increasing fees.
    • Cost of living pressures are also having an impact on the sport and physical activity workforce: Some people are volunteering less due to time constrains, meaning that other people are volunteering more due to demand. Paid staff, especially those with low wages or in casual positions, are leaving for better opportunities elsewhere, while some employers are considering redundancies and closures due to budget constraints.
  • The cost of sport is a big issue for families. What is Australia doing about it?, opens in a new tab Gemma Breen, ABC, (11 June 2023). For Sarah McGovern, keeping her kids in sport is crucial, but also overwhelming. "This year's soccer registration was two weeks earlier than usual. We were going to pay the rates, but I put them off and thought, they can just be late," she says.
  • Cost-of-living crisis could see more kids dropping out of organised sport, opens in a new tab. Jessica Stwart, ABC, (25 February 2023). Parents are being forced to choose between their children playing sport and putting food on the table, as the cost-of-living crisis continues to squeeze out household budget non-essentials.
  • National Sport Participation Strategy: Survey snapshot, Australian Sports Commission, (2023). In 2023 more than 6,600 Australians responded to a survey to help identify motivators and barriers to participating in sport. 45% of respondents agreed that sport was 'too expensive to play/buy gear', the largest percentage recorded for any barrier.
  • Strategies to Reduce Financial Barriers to Inclusion and Participation, opens in a new tab, Football Australia, (2023). The financial barrier to participation in sport is generally a tough one to overcome as a club, but with creative thinking and support from diverse partnerships, there multiple ways to breakdown that barrier. This factsheet will highlight ideas you can implement to your club, such as: Promote Government Funded Sports Vouchers; Pricing Strategies; Payment Plans; Second-hand Equipment Market; Lowering Registration Fees for Volunteers; Subsidising Fees.
  • Richer schools’ students run faster: how the inequality in sport flows through to health, opens in a new tab, Vaughan Cruickshank, Jeffrey Thomas, Kira Patterson, The Conversation, (11 July 2022). We like to believe sport is the great leveller and privilege doesn’t matter once you enter the arena or sports field. Yet our study indicates this isn’t true. Educational advantage carries over into sporting participation and success. This finding matters for reasons other than sport. Sport promotes physical activity, and the gaps in participation and success go some way towards explaining disparities in the health of students from advantaged and disadvantaged backgrounds. Our findings suggest better funding and resourcing for government schools, particularly those in areas of low-socioeconomic status (SES), could make a substantial difference to supporting healthy active lifestyles for all Australian students.
  • Sport can be an important part of Aboriginal culture for women – but many barriers remain, opens in a new tab, Michelle O'Shea, Hazel Maxwell, Megan Stronach, Sonya Pearce, The Conversation, (23 January 2020). Regular exercise is important for Indigenous women’s health, as it protects against obesity and chronic conditions such as heart disease and diabetes.  Active mothers and aunts are important role models for their children and peers; while women’s involvement as sport leaders, coaches and participants can empower Indigenous girls to participate in sports at community to elite levels. In 2012, only 23.3% of Indigenous women played sport, walked for fitness or leisure, or were physically active in the previous 12 months. Cost, was one of the barriers identified especially for women living in remote Indigenous communities, transport costs and logistics significantly impacted their participation in organised sport. The costs of registering for a sporting team, for example, and having to purchase a team uniform meant they were unable to compete. Our research also found that some Aboriginal people viewed time spent participating in sport and physical activity as “selfish” because it took them away from their family care commitments and responsibilities.
  • How Kids’ Sports Became a $15 Billion Industry, opens in a new tab, Sean Gregory, Time, (24 August 2017). Across the nation, kids of all skill levels, in virtually every team sport, are getting swept up by a youth-sports economy that increasingly resembles the pros at increasingly early ages. At the high end, families can spend more than 10% of their income on registration fees, travel, camps and equipment.
  • Which junior winter sport is the most affordable for you? See our fees guide for the upcoming season , opens in a new tab[paywall], Brayden Heslehurst, Quest Newspapers/Courier Mail, (23 February 2017). Compares the average upfront registration costs of several popular sports in the Brisbane area including: Australian rules football; rugby league; netball; rugby union; hockey; and football (soccer). Costs range from AU$195 to AU$415.
  • The troubling price of playing youth sports, opens in a new tab, Mark Hyman, The Conversation, (3 June 2015). The escalating costs [of youth sport] are a growing concern on sidelines and in bleachers across this country. Ultimately, the price of play threatens something fundamental about sports for our kids: the expectation of a level playing field and an egalitarian spirit.

  • Has kids sport become too expensive, opens in a new tab [audio; 51 mins], ABC Radio Melbourne, (7 March 2024). From registration fees, uniforms, to petrol, when we look at the cost of living crisis, is sport the first thing to go? The implications of kids not being able to afford to play sport are wide spread and can have a broader impact on the community. In this edition of The Conversation Hour the team talk how we make children's sport affordable.

  • AusPlay data portal: Payment to participate data, opens in a new tab, Australian Sports Commission, (accessed 8 July 2025). Updated twice annually this report provides representative survey data on the percentage of Australians who pay to participate in sport or physical activities, and the mean and median expenditure.
  • AusPlay data portal: Payment to participate by activity data, opens in a new tab, Australian Sports Commission, (accessed 8 July 2025). Updated twice annually this report provides representative survey data on the percentage and number of Australians who pay to participate in specific activities (e.g. Badminton), as well as the mean, median, and total expenditure for each sport/activity.
  • How is the play, active recreation and sport sector in Aotearoa changing? Participation, funding and economic trends shaping the sector, opens in a new tab, Sport New Zealand Ihi Aotearoa, (August 2024). Sport NZ has recently completed several research reports into the funding and economics of the play, active recreation and sport system, and the participation habits of New Zealanders. This report summarises key trends shaping the play, active recreation and sport sector in Aotearoa New Zealand and includes practical suggestions about how sector organisations can be more sustainable and build resilience into the future. The research shows that we have an increasingly strong evidence base about the social and economic value that sport and active recreation provides for Aotearoa, which can be used to advocate on behalf of the sector. It also shows several challenges facing the sector that will require organisations to adapt, particularly in the areas of cost reduction, funding sustainability, and participant-centred experiences.
  • The Cost of Participation in Sport, opens in a new tab, Rochelle Eime, Melanie Charity, Jack Harvey, et al., PASI Global, (August 2023). The aim of this study was to explore the cost of participation across different types of activity (e.g. sport versus non-sport, team versus individual sport), age group, and pre-compared to post-COVID-19 restrictions (2019 compared to 2021). Overall, it seems that when people ‘paid to play’, there was no major difference between sport and non-sport in the proportion who paid. It is also clear that non-team sports were, and remained, more expensive than team sports, but that the amount paid for the various activities did not significantly increase. A trend of major concern for organised sport is that, compared to non-sport and recreational activities, fewer paid to engage in sport, and team sport in particular.
    • There were no differences between sport and non-sport activities, or between those who participated in team sports, individual sports, or recreation, in the proportion who paid to play.
    • For children aged 15 years or younger, a higher proportion of team participants paid to play, but the amounts of money paid were higher for non-team activities.
    • For those aged 15 years and older there was no difference in the proportion of those who paid to play. The amount paid for individual sports was higher than for team sports.
  • In the Game: Enabling Muslim girls to play sport and be active, opens in a new tab, Change the Game, (June 2023). The experiences of Muslim girls and women participating in sport and physical activity are diverse, and can be influenced by a range of factors, including social, cultural, religious and economic factors. This summary outlines key findings from research that examined barriers to participation in sport and physical activity by Muslim girls, and highlights opportunities and solutions to overcoming these barriers. Cost of membership, uniforms, equipment and transport was one of the key barriers and challenges identified for Muslim girls in playing sport.
  • Annual Disability and Activity Survey 2022-23, opens in a new tab, Activity Alliance (UK), (June 2023). The fourth Annual Disability and Activity Survey report for 2022-23. The survey is the primary source of insight for organisations working to achieve fairness for disabled people in sport and activity. Key findings include:
    • Disabled people were more likely to say they wanted to be more active compared to non-disabled people (77% vs 54%). This “activity gap” has remained consistent in previous years, showing an ongoing unmet need.
    • Four in ten disabled people (37%) said the cost-of-living crisis has affected how active they are, versus three in ten non-disabled people (32%).
    • However – many disabled people fear that being more active will result in their benefits or financial assistance being removed (37%).
    • Almost two-thirds (64%) of disabled people said the government should focus on making activities affordable to help more people to be active.
    • Younger disabled people and people with five or more impairments were most likely to say the cost-of-living crisis has reduced how active they are (58% and 56%) and how much they socialise (74% and 75%).
  • Clubs under pressure: Australian community sport research findings, opens in a new tab, Australian Sports Foundation, (May 2023). The Australian Sports Foundation (ASF) conducted this research between February and March 2023. Responses represent nearly 3,000 community sporting clubs across Australia. The report highlights that challenging economic conditions have placed additional strain on community sporting clubs. 68% of sporting clubs surveyed had experienced increased running costs in areas such as insurance, maintenance, utility bills, affiliation fees, new ways of operating, rent, wages/salaries, bank/loan repayments. 52% of clubs surveyed reported cost of living impacts as a growing barrier to member registrations.
  • Factors relating to women and girls' participation (retention and dropout) in sport, opens in a new tab, Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, (February 2023). The survey was completed by 5,055 women and girls including 2,016 who played football and 3,039 who participated in gymnastics. For respondents one of the main reasons for dropping out was cost (25% overall; 27% for the 0-12 age group; and 28% for women over 18 years. For adolescent girls, 13-17 years cost wasn't a primary reason for dropping out). The report recommended that sports consider a range of cost measures to ensure that participating in the sport is available to individuals and families of low socio-economic households/communities. Such measures can include repurposing uniforms and equipment in good condition or providing financial discounts to individuals and families in return for volunteer time.
  • Counting the Cost of Living: The impact of financial stress on young people - Insights from the 2023 Mission Australia Youth Survey, opens in a new tab, Filia, K., Teo, S.M., Gan, D., et al., Orygen and Mission Australia, (2024). Sports activities were attended more frequently by those without financial stresses, likely due to the typically high costs associated with participation and spectating. These findings held true when both hardships and concerns were experienced, and the likelihood of not engaging in these community activities increased under such circumstances.
    • For those who reported financial hardships 53% were sports participants (compared to 67% who did not report financial hardships) and 41% were sport spectators (compared to 50% of those who did not report financial hardships).
    • Those who were very or extremely concerned about financial security were less likely to participate in sport as a participant (56% compared to 66% who were not at all or somewhat concerned about financial security) or as a spectator (42% compared to 49% of those who were not at all or somewhat concerned).
    • The report recommended governments increase and prioritise funding to initiatives that provide bursaries, scholarships and other fee support to young people experiencing financial hardship to participate in arts, sports, technology projects, music and other community activities.
  • The rising cost of living and its impact on sport and physical activity, opens in a new tab. Sport England, (2023). The cumulative effect of rising interest rates and higher energy prices means that the cost of living has increased sharply for many people, and the impact of this increase means that people have less discretionary income after paying their fixed costs. People from low-income houses who spend a higher proportion of income on housing, fuel and power are amongst the groups who are most likely to be affected by cost of living increases, as they have less in the way of ‘slack’ to absorb increased living costs.
  • Half of Australian families making financial sacrifices to keep their children in sport - or face pulling them out, opens in a new tab, UNICEF Australia, (20 November 2022). As the cost-of-living pressures continue to bite, a new poll released by UNICEF Australia to coincide with World Children’s Day today shows that more than 1 in 2 families are having to make sacrifices in their household budget to pay for their children’s sports or physical activities, or face having to stop those activities altogether. The survey also found that parents believe all costs associated with sport or physical activities have gone up over time - most notably session and travel costs, making it the biggest barrier to participating in extra-curricular sports/physical activities.
  • Sport participation among lower income households in the ACT, opens in a new tab, ACT Government research project, (2021). As part of a broader focus on improving health outcomes for ACT residents, Sport and Recreation (ACT Government) commissioned research to examine barriers to sports participation among lower income households in Canberra, and to better understand what could be done to assist them to overcome these barriers and be more active, and ultimately healthier. The research involved 30x in-depth individual and paired interviews with members of lower-income households from across Canberra, conducted in September and October 2021.
  • Sport participation among lower income ACT households: Full report, , opens in a new tabOrima Research for ACT Government, (2021).
    • Many people on low incomes were more likely to be active in ways that are free or low cost. less likely to have grown up playing sport, and less likely to be interested in traditional organised sport, seeing it as ‘boring’, repetitive, and generally unappealing.
    • Lower income households tend to have little disposable time and money, spend more time on essential activities like work and care, prioritise the needs of the family unit over their own, and rely more heavily on public transport to get around. With less money to spend, they also have less access to allied health care and are relatively more concerned about the risk and consequences of injury. They are also more likely to work in physically and emotionally taxing jobs often with highly variable and/or inflexible schedules, and may be more tired at the end of the work day.
    • Lower income households are also more likely to face additional barriers to participation. These stemmed from the high levels of impairment (physical, social, and psychological), social anxiety and relative isolation observed among this segment.
    • Lower income households tend to be less aware of ways to be active and how to get involved, as well as less sure about how to progress in sport. They are likely to be less familiar with different types of sports and sport settings and see trying something new as a bigger risk (financially, socially, and from a physical health perspective).
    • With less access to private transport, lower income households are more likely to rely on local facilities.
    • With less disposable income, they are also less able to afford (good) equipment and may find common payment structures less suitable.
    • In addition to budget constraints, people in this segment face many competing demands for their time, making regular attendance difficult. This means they may be reluctant to sign up to activities that require an ongoing commitment to participate at a set time or frequency.
    • Simply making existing activities cheaper, while important, would in practice likely have minimal impact on increasing engagement for people who aren’t aware of ways they can participate, or who see doing so as too big a risk. Similarly, cost-based initiatives would likely have a low impact on people who are simply not attracted to the traditional paradigm of sport participation.
    • The research suggests that increasing sport participation among lower income households will require finding new ways of engaging people and supporting them to participate, as well as enabling them to get something different out of doing so – something they see as worth the investment and risk. In the near term, initiatives that place a greater emphasis on helping people find activities that are right for them, and to build social skills and connection through participation are likely be more effective than ones that target cost or access alone.
  • Voucher schemes to promote increased participation in Sport and Active Recreation: Rapid evidence review, opens in a new tab, Bellew, B., Young, S., University of Sydney SPRINTER Group for the NSW Office of Sport, (2021). Evidence for the effectiveness of creating or enhancing access to places for physical activity and providing informational outreach is strong. Creating or enhancing access to places for physical activity and providing informational outreach may achieve up to a 25% relative increase in the proportion of the population who are physically active at least three times per week. This evidence should be interpreted not as applying to voucher schemes in isolation, but rather to the multicomponent programs such as those implemented in Queensland and Victoria.
  • Keeping Girls in the Game: Factors that Influence Sport Participation, opens in a new tab, Zarrett, N., Veliz, P.T., and Sabo, D. Women’s Sports Foundation, (2020). This report explores how key characteristics of youth (intrapersonal), their social influences (e.g., interpersonal parent and peer factors), and experiences within the sport setting may vary by gender, age, race/ethnicity, family socioeconomic background, and region. The survey was administered to a nationally representative sample of American boys and girls (N=3,041) between the ages of 7-17 and their parents (N=3,041) to inquire about child‑related, sport-related, and systemic factors expected to influence youth access, experiences, and motivations for initial participation (entrance) and sustained/continued participation in sport. One of the key findings highlighted that cost, transportation, and lack of access keep youth out, especially those with low household incomes, girls, and certain ethnic groups.
  • Getting Involved in Sport: A report about people with disability taking part in sport, opens in a new tab, Australian Sports Commission, (2012). Over 1000 persons were surveyed during 2010-11 to determine their thoughts on sport for persons with disability. Key findings from this survey include: (1) taking part in community activities and interacting with other people are important motivations to participate in sport; (2) sport promoted a sense of achievement and self-esteem; (3) sport provided a simulating environment that promoted positive health outcomes; and (4) sport was fun. The survey found that ‘disability’ was not the main reason for non-participation in sport. Cost factors, such as transport requirements, support personnel (when required), and club fees appear to be a major barrier to participation. 75% of people with disability (who already play sport) want to play more; this should give sporting organisations good reason to make their programs and venues more inclusive.

  • It’s about time to exercise: development of the Exercise Participation Explained in Relation to Time (EXPERT) model, opens in a new tab, Sean Healy, Freda Patterson, Stuart Biddle, et al., British Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 58(19), pp.1131-1144, (2024). A perceived ‘lack of time’ is consistently the most commonly reported barrier to exercise. However, the term fails to capture the multifaceted nature of time-related factors. Recognising the need for a more comprehensive analysis of ‘lack of time’ as a barrier to exercise, the aim of this study was to develop the exercise participation explained in relation to time (EXPERT) model. The model was developed through a sequential process including (1) an umbrella literature review of time as a barrier, determinant, and correlate of physical activity; (2) a targeted review of existing temporal models; (3) drafting the model and refining it via discussions between eight authors; (4) a three-round Delphi process with eight panel members; and (5) consultations with seven experts and potential end-users. The final EXPERT model includes 31 factors within four categories: (1) temporal needs and preferences for exercise (ie, when and how long does an individual need/want to exercise), (2) temporal autonomy for exercise (ie, autonomy in scheduling free time for exercise), (3) temporal conditions for exercise (ie, available time for exercise) and (4) temporal dimensions of exercise (ie, use of time for exercise). Definitions, examples and possible survey questions are presented for each factor. The EXPERT model provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the multi-dimensional nature of ‘time’ as it relates to exercise participation. It moves beyond the simplistic notion of 'lack of time' and delves into the complexity of time allocation in the context of exercise. Empirical and cross-cultural validations of the model are warranted.
  • Perceived barriers to sports participation among adolescent girls from low socioeconomic status neighbourhoods, opens in a new tab, Cecilie Karen Ljungmann, Julie Hellesøe Christensen, Helene Rald Johnsen, Sport in Society, (29 November 2023). This study examined perceived barriers to sports participation among adolescent girls from low socioeconomic status (SES) neighbourhoods. A total of 11 semi-structured focus groups were conducted, involving 44 adolescent girls who were not engaged in organized sports. Thematic analysis was used to generate themes, and revealed that; 1) Participants prioritized homework, household duties and socializing with friends over sports. 2) Girls refrained from participating in sport due to fear of not fitting in because of ethnic background and reluctance to participate alone. Moreover, 3) feelings of inadequacy in sporting abilities, 4) bodily discomfort, and negative body image were perceived as barriers. 5) Finally, gender stereotypes, depicting sports as unsuitable for girls, along with negative attitudes from boys, further discouraged girls’ engagement. These findings offer a nuanced understanding of the barriers faced by this underrepresented group, informing the design of future interventions aimed at promoting sports participation among adolescent girls from low SES neighbourhoods.
  • The health and education impact of removing financial constraints for school sport, opens in a new tab, Lauren Denise Sulz, Doug Lee Gleddie, Cassidy Kinsella, European Physical Education Review, Volume 29(1), pp.3-21, (2023). Financial barriers often restrict sport participation among children from low-income families. Schools are thought to offer equitable access to programming, including school sport participation. However, pay-to-play school sport models can inhibit participation among students from low-income households. Recognizing the potential benefits of school sport and realizing the financial barriers to participation, the purpose of this study was to understand the extent to which school sport promotes educational experiences and holistic well-being of Canadian youth from low-income families. A case study was conducted with stakeholders who were supported by funding from a non-profit organization to help cover the costs of school sport registration fees. Data were collected from in-depth interviews with low-income students and their parents, teacher-coaches and school administrators. Three overarching themes were representative of the experiences of school sport participation among low-income students: (1) healthy student-athletes, (2) developing student-athletes in school, for life, and (3) supporting student-athletes as a community. The participants perceived that school sport participation offered holistic health benefits, and developed skills and behaviours that support positive educational experiences and foster life skills. Further, our results highlighted the importance of the school community in supporting low-income students to participate in school sport teams and the need to reframe school sport to better support low-income families.
  • "It Goes Hand in Hand with Us Trying to Get More Kids to Play" Stakeholder Experiences in a Sport and Active Recreation Voucher Program, opens in a new tab. Foley BC, Turner N, Owen KB, et al., International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Volume 20(5), 4081, (2023). Vouchers that reduce the cost of sport and active recreation participation have been shown to increase children’s and adolescent’s physical activity levels. Yet, the influence of government-led voucher programs on the capacity of sport and active recreation organisations is unclear. This qualitative study explored the experiences of stakeholders in the sport and recreation sector that were engaged in implementing the New South Wales (NSW) Government’s Active Kids voucher program in Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 sport and active recreation providers. Interview transcriptions were analysed by a multidisciplinary team using the Framework method. Overall, participants reported that the Active Kids voucher program was an acceptable intervention to address the cost barrier to participation for children and adolescents. Three main steps influenced the capacity of organisations to deliver their sport and recreation programs and the voucher program: (1) Implementation priming—alignment of the intervention aims with stakeholder priorities and early information sharing, (2) Administrative ease—enhanced technology use and establishment of simple procedures, and (3) Innovation impacts—enablement of staff and volunteers to address barriers to participation for their participants. Future voucher programs should include strategies to enhance the capacity of sport and active recreation organisations to meet program guidelines and increase innovation.
  • Segregation and success in Tasmanian primary school sport carnivals, opens in a new tab, Jeff Thomas, Vaughan Cruickshank, Kira Patterson, Sport Education and Society, Volume 28(8), pp.929-942, (2023). Australian schooling is one of the most segregated systems in the OECD, with much focus on the inequality between schools from poorer areas compared with those from wealthier suburbs. These inequalities have been explored in terms of infrastructure and funding, as well as their relative academic achievement. Previous research has also found that children from more disadvantaged backgrounds are more likely to have poorer health than their wealthier peers. To determine whether there is a connection between these findings, this study investigates the impact of social and educational advantage on participation and success in primary school sports carnivals in Tasmania. It examined the results of Tasmanian primary schools across interschool cross-country carnivals between 2009 and 2019 and found that structural segregation existed across all competitions. Multiple regression was used to see if the Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage (ICSEA), total school enrolments and geographic location predicted school cross-country rank. It was found that school size, geographic region and ICSEA all played an independent role in determining the participation and success of schools. Implications of these findings are discussed.
  • Parental perceptions of a national program that funds sport participation for low-income children and youth in Canada, opens in a new tab, Marianne Clark, Christa Costas-Bradstreet, Nicholas Holt, et al., Leisure Sciences, Volume 44(8), pp.1082-1098, (2022). Families living in low income face complex and intersecting barriers that inhibit young people’s activity engagement. Programs that fund or subsidize child and youth sport and PA can help alleviate these barriers and provide social benefits for both parents and children. Future research is needed that considers the complexity of intersecting barriers and works to create more equitable provisions for young people’s sport and PA participation.
  • Facilitators and Barriers to Physical Activity and Sport Participation Experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Adults: A Mixed Method Review, opens in a new tab, Bridget Allen, Karla Canuto, John Robert Evans, et al., International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Volume 18(18), (September 2021). A systematic search was undertaken of 11 databases and 14 grey literature websites during 2020. The included studies reported physical activity facilitators and barriers experienced by Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander participants aged 18+ years, living in the community. Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-two facilitators were identified: 23 individual, 18 interpersonal, 8 community/environmental and 13 policy/program facilitators. Additionally, 63 barriers were identified: 21 individual, 17 interpersonal, 15 community/environmental and 10 policy/program barriers. Prominent facilitators included support from family, friends, and program staff, and opportunities to connect with community or culture. Prominent barriers included a lack of transport, financial constraints, lack of time, and competing work, family or cultural commitments. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults experience multiple facilitators and barriers to physical activity participation. Strategies to increase participation should seek to enhance facilitators and address barriers, collaboratively with communities, with consideration to the local context.
  • Effects of the Active Kids voucher program on children and adolescents’ physical activity: a natural experiment evaluating a state-wide intervention, opens in a new tab, Bridget Foley, Katherine Owen, Adrian Bauman, et al., BMC Public Health, Volume 21, Article number 22, (January 2021). There is an urgent need for scaled-up effective interventions which overcome barriers to health-enhancing physical activity for children and adolescents. In New South Wales (NSW), Australia, the state government implemented a universal voucher program, ‘Active Kids’ to support the cost of structured physical activity registration for school-enrolled children aged 4.5–18 years old. The objective of this study was to understand the effects a financial incentive intervention delivered in a real-world setting has on children and adolescent’s physical activity participation. Study participants reported increasing their days achieving physical activity guidelines from 4.0 days per week at registration to 4.9 days per week after 6 months. Increased physical activity was observed for all sociodemographic population groups. The voucher-specific activity contributed 42.4% to the total time children participated in structured physical activities outside of school. Children and adolescents who increased to, or maintained, high levels of activity were socially supported to be active, had active parent/caregivers, had better concentration and were overall happier than their low-active counterparts. The Active Kids program significantly increased children’s physical activity levels and these increases continued over a six-month period. The Active Kids voucher program shows promise as a scaled-up intervention to increase children and adolescents’ physical activity participation.
  • The Long-Run Effects of Sports Club Vouchers for Primary School Children, opens in a new tab, Jan Marcus, Thomas Siedler, Nicolas Ziebarth, NBER Working Paper 28819, (2021). Starting in 2009, the German state of Saxony distributed sports club membership vouchers among all 33,000 third graders in the state. The policy’s objective was to encourage them to develop a long-term habit of exercising. In 2018, we carried out a large register-based survey among several cohorts in Saxony and two neighboring states. Our difference-indifferences estimations show that, even after a decade, awareness of the voucher program was significantly higher in the treatment group. We also find that youth received and redeemed the vouchers. However, we do not find significant short- or long-term effects on sports club membership, physical activity, overweightness, or motor skills.
  • Reducing financial barriers through the implementation of voucher incentives to promote children’s participation in community sport in Australia, opens in a new tab, L. J. Reece, C. McInerney, K. Blazek, et al., BMC Public Health, Volume 20, Article number: 19, (2020). Socio-economic status was associated with sports-related expenditure and sports participation amongst children. Sport vouchers should target children in the most disadvantaged areas to promote participation in organised sport and physical activity.
  • Barriers to voluntary participation in sport for children: a systematic review, opens in a new tab, Sarah Somerset and Derek J. Hoare, BMC Pediatrics, Volume 18, article 47, (February 2018). Policy makers, parents and teachers should all be aware that ‘cost’ and ‘time’ are key barriers to participation in sport. More local sports opportunities are needed where costs are reduced. Schools and local clubs could better work together to provide more affordable local opportunities to increase children’s participation in sport.
  • Can't play, won't play: longitudinal changes in perceived barriers to participation in sports clubs across the child-adolescent transition, opens in a new tab, Basterfield L, Gardner L, Reilly J, et.al., BMJ Open Sport and Exercise Medicine, Volume 2(1), (March 2016). This longitudinal study of children and adolescents uses an ecological model of physical activity to assess changes in barriers to participation in sports clubs and to identify age-specific and weight-specific targets for intervention. The analysis showed that barriers at age 9 were predominantly of a physical or environmental nature. Young children relied upon parental involvement for transport, costs and permission to participate; also, there was a lack of suitable club infrastructure. At age 12 years the perceived barriers were predominantly classed as intrapersonal. Reponses for not participating in sport included – it’s boring and my friends don’t go to sport. At both ages weight status was not perceived as a barrier to sport participation. The authors suggest that future interventions aiming to increase sport participation among children may not need to emphasise mediating overweight, but instead concentrate on the perception of fun and inclusion. Transport, cost, and access to quality sports programs remain as barriers to participation.
  • The Exclusionary Practices of Youth Sport, opens in a new tab, Bethan Kingsley, Nancy Spencer-Cavaliere, Social Inclusion, Volume 3(3), (June 2015). Youth who live with lower incomes are known to experience social exclusion in a range of social settings, including sport. Despite efforts to reduce financial constraints to participation, increasing opportunities in these ways has not led to increased involvement. There is a need to move beyond a discussion about barriers and explore the quality of young people’s engagement within sport. The present study consequently sought to understand the sport involvement of young people living with lower incomes. Interpretive description informed the analysis of transcripts generated from interviews with ten youth (aged 13-18 years) and six parents. Three themes captured the ways income had a prominent influence on the sports involvement of young people. Sports settings generally required that young people acquire abilities from an early age and develop these concertedly over time. The material circumstances in which youth were brought up impacted the extent to which they could or wanted to participate in these ways. The final theme outlines the experiences of young people in sport when they possessed less cultural capital than others in the field. The findings of the study collectively highlight a number of interconnected exclusionary processes in sport and demonstrate the need to reimagine sport in ways that challenge the hegemonic discourses continuing to exclude a large number of young people.
  • Participation in sport and physical activity: associations with socio-economic status and geographical remoteness, opens in a new tab, Rochelle Eime, Melanie Charity, Jack Harvey, et al., BMC Public Health, Volume 15, Article number: 434, (2015). Many factors influence participation in sport and Physical Activity (PA). It is well established that socio-economic status (SES) is a critical factor. There is also growing evidence that there are differences in participation patterns according to residential location. However, little is known more specifically about the relationship of PA participation and frequency of participation in particular contexts, to SES and residential location. This study investigated the relationship of participation, and frequency and context of participation, to SES and location. This study demonstrates the complexity of the associations between SES and location across different contexts of participation. Nevertheless, it seems that once initial engagement in PA is established, SES and remoteness are not critical determinants of the depth of engagement.
  • Willingness-to-Pay in Non-Profit Sports Clubs, opens in a new tab, Pamela Wicker, International Journal of Sport Finance, 6(2), pp.155-169, (2011). In Germany, some sports clubs increasingly encounter financial problems due to decreasing public subsidies. A way to compensate for the decrease is to increase membership fees. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze members’ willingness-to-pay (WTP) for membership fees and to identify determinants of WTP. For this study, active, adult members (n = 10,013) in 21 sports were surveyed. The results show that members paid an average annual membership fee of €148 and stated an average WTP of €265. The consumer surplus for all sports amounted to €113 on average. The results of the regression analysis reveal that WTP is determined significantly by the current membership fee, personal income, level of education, years of participation, and level of performance. The findings of the study suggest that increasing membership fees might be one option for sports clubs experiencing financial problems. Sport-specific differences have to be considered in this regard.

  • Drivers and barriers of participation, Australian Sports Commission, (accessed 8 July 2025). A toolkit to support organisations to design and deliver participation outcomes, to get more Australians moving more often. The toolkit covers drivers and barriers of participation, trends that impact sport participation, and planning methodology, including 'Cost'.
    • Participation in sport often involves significant investment which can be a major barrier for Australians, particularly families where all members may wish to participate in a number of sports. Costs include fees, uniform, travel and equipment. This barrier can be overcome through the Product Design, Commercial and Infrastructure and Equipment drivers.

Access to resources Where possible, direct links to full-text and online resources are provided. However, where links are not available, you may be able to access documents directly by searching our licenced full-text databases (note: user access restrictions apply). Alternatively, you can ask your institutional, university, or local library for assistance—or purchase documents directly from the publisher. You may also find the information you’re seeking by searching Google Scholar, opens in a new tab.

Working together for Australian sport

C4S-Footer-Sport Integrity Australia logo
C4S-Footer-Sport Integrity Australia logo
C4S-Footer-Australian Sports Foundation logo
C4S-Footer-Australian Sports Foundation logo
C4S-Footer-Australian Olympic Committee
C4S-Footer-Australian Olympic Committee
C4S-Footer-Paralympics Australia logo
C4S-Footer-Paralympics Australia logo
C4S-Footer-Commonwealth Games Australia logo
C4S-Footer-Commonwealth Games Australia logo
C4S-Footer-SAHOF
C4S-Footer-SAHOF
C4S-Footer-Invictus Australia logo
C4S-Footer-Invictus Australia logo
C4S-Footer-PLA
C4S-Footer-PLA
C4S-Footer-ACT Gov
C4S-Footer-ACT Gov
C4S-Footer-NSW Gov
C4S-Footer-NSW Gov
C4S-Footer-NT Gov
C4S-Footer-NT Gov
C4S-Footer-QLD Gov
C4S-Footer-QLD Gov
C4S-Footer-SA Gov
C4S-Footer-SA Gov
C4S-Footer-Tas Gov
C4S-Footer-Tas Gov
C4S-Footer-Vic Gov
C4S-Footer-Vic Gov
C4S-Footer-WA Gov
C4S-Footer-WA Gov
C4S-Footer-ACTAS
C4S-Footer-ACTAS
C4S-Footer-NSWIS
C4S-Footer-NSWIS
C4S-Footer-NT
C4S-Footer-NT
C4S-Footer-QAS
C4S-Footer-QAS
C4S-Footer-SASI
C4S-Footer-SASI
C4S-Footer-TIS
C4S-Footer-TIS
C4S-Footer-VIS
C4S-Footer-VIS
C4S-Footer-WAIS
C4S-Footer-WAIS
First Nations Flags, the Aboriginal flag and the Torres Strait Islander flag.
The Clearinghouse for Sport pay our respects to the Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past and present, and acknowledge the valuable contribution Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people make to Australian society and sport.